Ethics of euthanasia - introduction

In this article I will introduce discussion about euthanasia. Should humans have the right to decide life and death problems?

Euthanasia is the end of a patient's life to alleviate their suffering

People experiencing euthanasia are often suffering from intractable diseases. However, in other cases, there are people who want to end their life.

In many cases, it is done according to individual requirements, but sometimes they are too sick and may be determined by relatives, medical staff, or in some cases the court.

Euthanasia is illegal in the UK and it is illegal to help someone commit suicide. Voluntary euthanasia or assisted suicide may result in imprisonment of up to 14 years

This problem has been the focus of intense discussion for many years, surrounded by religious, moral, and practical considerations.

Is the life of the terminal patient with severe pain and pain correct?

The core of these arguments is a different view of the meaning and value of human existence.

Some people think euthanasia should not be tolerated even though they are ethically correct.

Euthanasia can keep people alive by taking actions including doing fatal injections or doing nothing (such as not being able to keep your feeding tube).

If a patient dies because he refused special or heavy medical treatment, it is not euthanasia.

Even if the medicine causes the patient to die soon, giving medicine to ease the pain is not euthanasia. This is because the doctor's intention is to ease the pain, not to kill the patient. Dual effect theory

In many cases, people call euthanasia "euthanasia". Perhaps for those who suffer from long-term unbearable pain due to illness at the end of the year.

Most people think that unbearable pain is the main reason for seeking euthanasia, but some surveys in the US and the Netherlands indicate that less than one-third of the euthanasia requirement is due to a severe pain Respectively.

The quality of life of people with end stage disease can be greatly compromised by physical conditions such as incontinence, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, paralysis and difficulty swallowing.

Psychological factors leading people to think about euthanasia include fear, loss of burden or aversion to dependence on depression, control or dignity

For decades, the question of whether euthanasia is right or wrong has been debated. The first article by Margaret Pabst Battin claims that euthanasia is moral. The university has printed. The second article by Joyce Ann Schofield argues that euthanasia is immoral and initially appeared as "an ethical challenge to American medicine" at the outset. It was published by legal and medical issues and was copyrighted in 1988. Both of these articles are published in the book "Euthanasia: The opposite view" published by Greenhaven Press, Inc. in 1989.

The theme of euthanasia is a topic that depends on a lot of moral debate and ambiguity. Various types of euthanasia were recognized, voluntary spontaneous euthanasia, assisted suicide and suicide suicide by a doctor were the most controversial. Broadly speaking, these terms are usually used to denote the end of a person 's life in order to end suffering through medication management. Euthanasia is currently illegal in all states in Australia and reflects the state of most countries, but some countries and states legally admit euthanasia under certain conditions.

There are many arguments about Jewish theology, ethics, and the theme of euthanasia of general view (especially in Israel and the United States). The Israel Supreme Court proclaims that passive euthanasia is legal under certain conditions and has reached a certain level of acceptance. Positive euthanasia is still illegal, but this topic is actively debated and there is no clear consensus on the legal, moral, theological and spiritual aspects.