Introduction In this white paper, we will consider a statement that "strict government regulation is necessary for corporate ethical behavior." We also discuss the impact of government regulation on corporate ethics and social responsibility. In addition, this article keeps the author's position with related business examples and appropriate reference materials. As an administrator, we bring our own concept of good and evil. All good or bad decisions are to apply these values to the immediate problem.
Social responsibility and corporate ethics are often considered the same concept. However, the social responsibility campaign is only one aspect of the overall discipline of business ethics. The social responsibility campaign emerged, especially in the 1960's, and the public is increasingly aware of the business role in helping to foster and maintain society, especially in high moral practices in the natural environment.
Corporate ethics and social responsibility are one thing. In general, however, social responsibility is one aspect of corporate ethics. Business ethics includes applying ethics to the corporate community, identifying responsibilities in commerce, identifying critical business and social issues, and assessing business ethics. Social responsibility initially involves identifying important business and social issues, followed by criticism of the business.
Business ethics and social responsibility are important to business. But they are not the same thing. A company that has developed sound social responsibility programs and policies can still take unethical behavior. Ethics is generally focused on good and evil, but the focus of business ethics is to do their best for shareholders and stakeholders. On the other hand, social responsibility focuses on the company's impact on the environment and the community. Social responsibility is a more duty to focus on the environment and the actions that will benefit society as a whole. For example, companies involved in bribery are in violation of business ethics, but they do not necessarily violate social responsibility.