Ethical Relativism and Cultural Relativism

When interpreting cultural relativism it is useful to compare and contrast it with ethical relativism. Cultural relativism is a moral theory focusing on the concept that habits and moral issues are essentially universal, but culturally specific. Each culture develops its own unique ethical principle separated from other cultures. Moral relativism is also a moral theory, and its morality also involves understanding the culturally defined way of morality. However, this expression is quite different from the widespread custom of human beings that encourages culture to distinguish between normal "good" customs and abnormal "bad" habits.

Holmes (1998: 163-164) discusses three forms of ethical relativism, ethical relativism, cultural relativism, extreme or individual relativism. I believe that ethical relativists have moral legitimacy and mistake, but cultural relativism suitable for people and culture is a type of relativism, moral beliefs and customs vary from culture to culture I insist. However, it is important to understand that cultural relativists do not believe that certain behaviors and practices are correct or wrong in a particular culture. They noticed the difference

Cultural relativism is different from ethical relativism. "Cultural relativism has its own intercultural reference, ethical relativism is basically within the scope of culture, the first one is to guide criteria for applying sanctions and thinking of society people The second question is whether you can guide any standard in any society to guide individual actions "(Herskovits, p. 88). Cultural relativism does not assert personal or ethical relativism. So far, anthropological and sociological studies have shown that no society can tolerate moral or moral disorder.