Ethical Issues with the World View of Contraception

Introduction to ethical problems of contraception Introduction to the world view: The way of thinking leading to contraception is self-service and self-centered. People use contraceptives everyday for selfish reasons. A child is regarded as a blessing of God, and the couple must decide the time to give birth. Today, people are trying to use contraceptives, so you can decide when to give birth. This is selfish and ignores God. Different churches have different opinions on contraception. From 1920 to 1930, all the churches had views on the same contraception.

From the perspective of contraceptive tasks, the two opposite moral rules are rights and justice / fairness. Velázquez's Business Ethics: From concepts and cases, the rules of rights are "individual rights to something". It deals with contraceptive requirements for personal problems and company problems. Rights rules are treated from an employer's point of view based on religion. The justice / fair rules briefly discussed in this case is an equalityist perspective. Equality means "Everyone should benefit from society or group's benefits and burdens." It solves contraceptive problems from systematic problems.

This completes the systematic development of morality of contraception and abortion ethics. In this section I would like to resolve the most important objections to this point of view. As I did, the fundamental objection to observing abortion ethics according to social population policy is that there is no practical doubt in replacing an adult with a concept, if a concept can be replaced by another concept is. Objections will continue if concept supply over supply situation occurs, Utilitarians may support the mature killings chosen to provide a clearer picture of additional concepts. The dissenting opinion related to this question is that if the future usefulness of adults does not need to consider the future usefulness of this concept in deciding whether a woman will be suspended or not, the moral opposition It can not be the cause of it.

I believe that abortion ethics should be seen in the context of Utilitarian population policy and hence in this respect is a natural but important extension of the utilitarian attitude toward contraception. I would like to emphasize that there is an important ethical difference between contraception and abortion. These are the differences. Generally, relying on abortion as a contraceptive method is neither cautious nor immoral. This is not wise because of the high incidence of abortion and death at all stages of pregnancy compared to contraception. In addition, abortion requires that all parties spend time to spend less stress