Ethical Implications of Placing Implantable Chips in Patients

Placing an implantable tip in a patient in order to accurately identify patients and preserve their historical records appropriately has become a vital argument. Even if not impossible to ensure that patients are properly identified and stored in their health history records for future use. For many medical institutions, the idea of ​​being able to search for accurate patient medical history for follow-up care without relying on patient memories is a difficult task.

As in patients with Parkinson's disease, we transplanted thousands of people with brain fragments that can successfully control movement and monks with cochlear implants that can achieve hearing. However, when it comes to strengthening brain and non-medical purposes without obstacles, it causes ethical and safety problems. According to last year's survey, 72% of Americans were not interested in brain implants because brain implants can improve memory and intelligence. However, some think that strengthening the healthy brain, including Christopher Koch, Chief Scientific Officer of Allen Brain Science Institute and Gary Marcus, a professor of psychology at New York University, is inevitable. They used the breast implant analogy - breast surgery was developed for the reconstruction and correction of birth defects after mastectomy, but later became popular with breast enhancement. They say that brain implants can follow the same path

As with any other, the most rational and general concern regarding the embedding of RFID chips is an unknown problem. What can I use tomorrow? According to CEO Todd Westby, Wisconsin's parents wanted (and forever) whether they could embed GPS enabled devices in their children (by the way this is the new season for Black Mirror). "The theme of" The Arkangel "episode) But this, of course, poses an ethical question: What happens if the child refuses to be disconnected? What if they do not know what to do?