One problem that has bothered me recently is the problem of the genetic structure of our descendants. We asked myself if we could choose the physical characteristics of our children. If so, do you think that this is a moral practice as a society? Perhaps scientifically, this may be perfectly possible, but the law may limit it. The article by Frederic Golden helped to understand this topic. Kim started writing a short story about her mother and father undergoing prenatal testing.
Science news entries entitled "Beyond the Genome: Ethics of DNA Inspection" written by Kathy A. Fackelmann on November 5, 1994 included some of the prenatal screening, including hypothetical cartilage I discuss the ethical dilemma. Flexible couples tell their doctor they choose abortion if they know that their children will not be gnomes. In April 2000, Solveig Magnus Reindal's article "Disability, gene therapy, eugenics - challenge to John Harris" discusses another virtual cartilage elastic couple who wants to transplant cartilage elastic embryos It is. . In vitro fertilization "Is it defensive?" Reindal asked. "The doctor is not achondroplasia, do you want to transplant the embryo beyond the husband's wishes?" The obvious answer is "course". No"
Prenatal screening and screening for genetic defects in pregnant women (LifeSiteNews, 2004) are obviously the most commonly used genetic techniques in humans. Although prenatal screening is still a very controversial ethical and political problem (Shakespeare, 1998), it is commonplace in most Western countries.