Essay sample library > Essence Vs Labor

Essence Vs Labor

2023-04-20 12:52:23

In this article we will consider the concept of the will of the 19th century from the perspective of Karl Marx and Ludwig Foilbach. Karl Marx will keep the position that human beings form the world around us through human labor. This is because the secular nature that Feuerbach is observing prevents people from changing what actually represses society. Neither Marx nor Feuerbach accepted John Fichte 's will - notion concept. It states that we express our world through our actions, but we are seeing it in a completely different way.

Under this alienated system of labor, Marx believed that human life force was stolen from him. In this view, the root cause of human direct difficulties is division of labor. For Marx, division of labor is the essence of all the mistakes of the world. This is contrary to the nature of human beings. Division of labor makes people walk with people, creates differences in class, and impairs human unity. Marx almost pays theological attention to the unity of mankind, so his hostility towards division of labor is perfect (even totalitarian).

Among the various reasons Marx believes that people and labor are alienated, the most important thing is that he believes that labor is alienated from themselves. Workers are not inherently workers, as Marx thinks that labor created by workers does not belong to workers. In this state, Marx believed that workers were enslaved. Marx 's enslavement is a condition different from humans, he is alienated from himself. For Marx, a person alienated from himself was deprived of his character. Not only because he was enslaved, but also because his life activities have been replaced. For Marx, human character is a free and conscious activity, and the pursuit of human beings is the activity of his life. Le Mans' life activity is the goal of his life. Therefore, the essence of man, his own life is the purpose of his existence. This is the situation before delivery. After labor, the activities of life, that is his feelings of freedom, activity or his nature will be replaced. Real labor

This fact seems to be that criticism is defined as complete reversal and concealment of the essence of human beings and labor. The Labor Party is not a "free activity", it is not the universal and free self-realization of man, but his slavery and loss of reality. A worker is not a lifelong expression, it is a physical subject of unnecessary things, pure 'abstract' activities. The purpose of labor is "foreign body" - "goods" belonging to things other than workers, not expression and confirmation of human reality of workers (Marcuse 2005: 104).