In today's globalized world human needs are increasing compared to the past and people need more space to meet all their needs. Animals and birds have the same rights as humans on earth, but because animals do not have the ability to speak, they can not talk for their own rights. From my retro viewpoint, it is very important to preserve the land for animals that are threatened with extinction rather than using the land for human beings. I would like to support my view for the following reasons.
The first subtle point to mention is that if an endangered animal is not saved it will soon be extinct. The undeniable fact is that the existence of human beings will have many problems if the biodiversity of the earth is adversely affected. Earth's ecosystem is balanced by all species of animals and bird species; if any species disappears from the corner of the forest, the entire ecosystem will be destroyed. Clearly, all species are interrelated, and certain prey is a predator of another species. For example, if a fox gets extinct, its prey increases the number of rabbits. Since this increase will destroy crops and human agriculture, people will not be able to get enough food to prosper on the planet. Therefore, in order to protect our lives, it is essential to support endangered species.
Another reason worth mentioning is that if the land of an animal is civilized by humans, that animal has no land to live in. In fact, due to deforestation, animals have lost their habitats of wildlife. By restoring the forest we can help animals improve their living environment. Animals move to cities and rural areas, find evacuation centers threatened in the city, and begin attracting people. Sometimes endangered animals do not have enough food to die of starvation. People can change their meals according to their physical condition, but the lion can not eat grass to support his life. Therefore, animals need more land than humans to regenerate their springs and endure their lives.
Finally, to meet human needs engineers can build the building with advanced infrastructure that uses the best land and leaves places for endangered species. With the help of genetically modified foods, people can overcome hunger. Because animals do not have efficient brains, they do not solve their problems like human beings. Therefore, we are responsible for sharing our environment with others.
Overall, I am convinced that people should conserve land in order to protect animals from extinction, protect ecosystems and respect other species for extinction-threatening species It is.
In short, the number of animals in danger of extinction is fewer than the population, so you do not need the land you need. I believe that human needs for agricultural land, housing and industry are more important than land to save endangered animals because of the population increase.
Civilization is the result of human effort. In the field of this civilization, the population increase and the lifestyle change are occurring under the name of development. Development is reflected in farmland, housing and industry. Some people think that human needs for agricultural land, housing and industry are more important than the land to save an endangered animal. At the same time, others are against it. Under the present circumstances, the world's population is about 7 billion. In this respect, the population of each country is according to that area. In Third World countries, population is an urgent problem to be solved compared to developed countries. The perfect nature of population growth demand is rising. In addition, the industrialization brought about by urbanization has brought about new changes. The standard of living is developed in a unique way. In this process, humans need agricultural land, housing and industry.
There is no need to conserve land for endangered animals. As we all know, economic development is very important to us. It will enrich us and improve our standard of living. The farmland gave us food, the house gave us evacuation centers, the industry gave us money. You may think that some animals like Giant Panda are sights of sightseeing. We can benefit from tourists. We can not deny that we can benefit from tourists, but who can promise that tourist resources must be higher than industrial resources? Not all endangered animals will attract tourists. Therefore land use for arable land, housing, industry is clearly more valuable.