Essay topics: Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Because the rapid development of medicine is always a topic of controversy, people expect the importance of life to increase. Many people think this is the greatest result of technology. Others oppose this concept, I do not think it is a positive development. In my opinion, the latter proposition seems more reasonable. In the next article we will elaborate further the evidence necessary for the parties to reach reliable conclusions.

First of all, the undeniable fact is that people's average life span has increased due to the development of the medical field. According to recent data, the average number of deaths has increased from 46.7 in 1990 to 59.4 in 2016. The above data shows that humans are making health related decisions that are thought to be due to public health and medical improvement. For example, new inventions in the medical field have found solutions to many dreadful diseases such as cancer, HIV and many diseases.

However, there are many pitfalls to improve life expectancy, so the lives of the elderly are increasing as the economic burden of regular health checkups and daily family hospital visits increases. People can stay with their families for a long time, which is a good thing, but the economic burden may lead to conflicts within the family. Furthermore, long life span means reduction of the country's labor force from the perspective of prosperity and growth. In addition, it leads to an increase in the population, causing many problems such as people's poverty, lack of basic equipment and more problems.

In short, advances in medical technology have created disadvantages, but it is not advantageous for future life. In other words, extending the average life expectancy places a burden on the environment and society.

Human self-thinking abilities will certainly decline as people become increasingly dependent on technology to solve problems. People are increasing their reliance on technology to solve problems, and human's ability to think self will surely decline. This question is the title of the old GRE ISSUE 66. The topic is divided into two parts: the first part states the fact that everyone will accept - "people rely on the technology to solve the problem more and more"; the second part is this fact It gives the judgment that "relying on science and technology inevitably reduces the ability of human self-thinking". In the analysis, you need to pay attention to the following two points. 1. Discussion must always be related to 'human's ability to think selfishly' and 'problem solving', regardless of the positive or negative effect of technology. The role should be in the direction "to help self-thinking" or "to force self-reflection" 2. It allows comparison and analysis to be static and independent, and dynamic analysis can also be used to analyze, change the impact, and analyze new circumstances. The appearance may affect judgment.

5. Everyone in society is responsible for observing, breaking fair legislation, breaking fraudulently.

Technology is an indispensable theme in the history of human health. Medical technology has changed human life. They lengthen the average life expectancy, lower the mortality rate of children, and are accustomed to the intervention and treatment of thousands of diseases. Of course, these outcomes brought about many cultural influences. As shown in the example below, successful efforts to physically intervene in the body also affect cultural values ​​and the social organization of the community.

Technological innovation redefines our lives. Our abilities and expectations are being reestablished in all walks of our lives. We all agree that evolving advanced technology creates new possibilities for everyone, but the real change is dependent on human intelligence (HI). Therefore, in an organization seeking leadership and innovation to foster human creativity, human intelligence is the greatest advantage. Since its inception in 1965 Gordon Moore has said that the number of transistors per square inch on an integrated circuit board has doubled every year. His hypothesis - this magnification rate will continue in the near future - is often called "Moore's Law". This is a good example of the speed of dramatic evolution of processing power. That means that in any new generation of technology, machines with processing power can do more than before.