Essay topics: Families who do not send their children to government-financed schools should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Education is an important element in the development of the country, and people should emphasize it very much. In fact, this concern can be achieved by paying taxes to schools funded by the government. Society is the first and last responsibility. As they are part of society due to their wealth, households should pay for universal education whether they send children to the government-funded schools.

Firstly, wealthy families living in this society should pay taxes to the schools funded by the government, and even if these taxes are paid to improve the quality of these schools it is economical No problem. In addition, family relatives are some of these school teachers and they need some help to improve machinery and educational tools, so if these families assist the school to pay taxes , What is the problem? Another point is that since these students have relationships with these families, they should pay taxes to help them.

Secondly, because families who do not send children to schools funded by the government are part of society, improving the quality of education will benefit society as a whole and society as a whole, so taxes on universal education You should pay. As a result, they will get them. For example, engineers and physicians graduate from government-funded schools, and these families will benefit from their experience in architecture and treatment.

In short, when wealthy families pay taxes for universal education they will profit from it each day. Besides that, if they pay some money, this will not be a big problem.

Some people have their children go to non-public schools. Some people have no children, but they are forced to pay taxes to support the national education system. Many people argue that parents who do not go to public schools for children do not need to pay taxes. But I absolutely disagree with this. Public schools are operated by the government. The cost of public school is very cheap. Most of the students enrolled in public schools are low-income families. Therefore, if these schools are closed due to lack of funds. As a result, parents can not afford the cost of private schools, so many students can not receive education. As a result, the government can not reduce inequality and only wealthy students can receive education.

Payment to families who should not bring children to schools funded by the government should not be required.

Certainly many parents are letting their children go to school which is not public and they do not need to pay tax for the educational system. Parents agree that they need to pay only for private schools the children are studying but I believe that taxing them is necessary to help the government improve the educational environment think. On the other hand, I agree to spend money on the school where my children live, it is enough for the family. For example, private elementary schools reinvest in tuition fees to create a high-quality environment for the future of the next generation. In addition, paying for the school has too much impact on the parents, so additional costs can be a burden in some respects. Due to geographical disadvantages and the complex politics of public schools, many poor families have few options.