When looking at women's history in sports, do women have to "integrate"? Well then? Drowning? Let's participate in male-led sports organizations and structures. The Olympic Games are an important example of the need for women to merge with male dominant organizations and submerge. The first modern Olympic Games were held in 1896, and women were not allowed to participate. When women were allowed to participate, there were only three sports in 1900, and among 1,225 athletes, only 19 were women. The Olympic Games allow women to "integrate" so that women can participate in the competition and reach the level of today's competition, but are women still overwhelmed? In the dominant male sports structure, ... Read more
However, there are still differences. In many other Olympic sports, we can not compare women and men's time and score because the rules are slightly different. For example, in shooting, women and men are competing together, but now sex is separated, so women participate in fewer incidents than men. In archery, women and men fire from different distances. Downhill skiing, cross country skiing, boating games, sled sliding and biathlon offer women with shorter courses than men; in basketball games the balls are smaller than men and basketball is lower than men. What is the difference between rules for men and women? Many women believe that the women's rules of the game will change slightly once the women seem to have caught up. Or, in sports where women can compete well like shooting or archery, the rules are slightly different so we can not compare scores between women and men.
Incorporating women into male-dominated sports is important not only for women to participate in sports but also for many social and cultural interests. In many countries, there are actually separate laws concerning women. In some Muslim countries, women have little rights; Iran refuses not to participate in the Olympics by allowing women to participate in sports competitions. Merger of women
It took many years for women to show similar appearance in sports. Throughout history, women have been excluded from sports and discriminated in sports. Men's movement has always dominated the field of university sports, but after title IX was passed, women finally got the opportunity to fight. In particular, Chapter 9 demands that scholarships be equal in men's and women's sports.
In the past 50 years, women's movement has made great progress. Women now can do more extensive sports and have access to many opportunities to exercise at the professional level. However, the sports world is still dominated by men. It is rare for women and men to participate in sports together, and women have a lower salary than men who participate in the same professional sports. In the recently announced list of the top 100 players in the world, there are only two women on the list. One of the women is Maria Sharapova, which is the highest ever female athlete ever, but has not passed the top 25 in comparison with male athletes. This figure raises the question of gender equality in sports, and more importantly, whether sports should be equivalent to male and female athletes. There are many arguments that support this statement, including equally preparing events for men and women, and changing the way society watches women.
Article 9 aims to strengthen educational equality, but it has a great influence on the development and improvement of gender equality in sports. Even so, the data shows that there is still a long way to going for women to feel equality and equal treatment of participation in sports and employment. Women are more involved than before and are receiving better treatment in sports management and sports, but the data shows that women are still more than men in terms of employment and sports participation. Therefore, in the field of sports management, we should continue to strive to equally provide opportunities for equality in sports management and sports participation, aiming to treat female qualitative levels truly equally.