Essay on Management vs. Leadership

Management and leadership are two concepts that are often used interchangeably, but in reality they represent the power that two different concept managers can get from their position and for leaders it is often from within (Naylor ). , 2004). Kapovsky supports this theory and argues that the contrast between management and leadership is heartfelt and heartfelt (Capowski, 1994). However, these roles are different, and they still may be "affecting the behavior of others" (Naylor, 2004). In this article, I will explain the ability of someone to become one, not both, but both, and how this will affect my role. The leader is not a manager

Leaders can be considered people who bring inspiration, adventure, creativity, and change (Naylor, 2004). "Leadership is not a standpoint but a phenomenon, it has nothing to do with the hierarchy", so you do not need to be an administrator with these qualities (Senge, 1996). In addition, Mr. Sheng Ji thinks that within the organization leaders should stand out from the power team of mid-level managers and that if they are only exercised from above they could be fatal.

Figure 3 shows the different qualities that leaders and administrators should have. Figure 3: Quality of Leaders and Administrators (Naylor, 2004)

According to J. Mullins (2005), management activities can be divided into five effective skills: organization, planning, coordination, control, and command. Analysis of these activities clearly shows that leadership skills are not necessary to implement these skills within the organization. For example, within an enterprise, planning involves considering the future, determining what needs to be achieved, and then formulating an action plan. These tasks do not require leadership skills, so others in the organization can do it. Administrators consider themselves as guardians and regulators of the existing order and receive rewards from them (Zaleznik,

The business world shows a variety of views on leadership and discussion by management. In 1989, Warren Venice listed a dramatic comparison between leaders and managers. The difference is "imitation of manager, origin of leader", "accept the present situation of manager, leader challenges" and so on. As you can imagine, the last picture of the manager is not very flattering. Hero. In fact, the two tags are not mutually exclusive. Leaders and administrators have their own advantages, these advantages are absolutely necessary and useful. In the previous article, everyone in the business always analyzed their strengths and pointed out that we need to evaluate where we need to grow. This does not mean that leadership and management have clearly different meanings and meanings. However, it is false assumption to assume that they are incompatible like oil and water.

In my last post (Leadership and Management), I talked about various themes that make leaders and managers different. If they are there, we will soon recognize the qualities of leadership, but it is difficult to copy. To be a leader, interpreting Margaret Thatcher is like a woman ... if you have to tell someone you are different. It is their fascination to highlight the leaders. A sense of direction and direction, and a sense of correct result. A good leader will motivate people to be responsible for accomplishing what they need to succeed (themselves and team-wide success) and completing tasks to achieve the team's goals I will let you. This is different from what we call allocation tasks or delegation.