Essay Descriptions of the Character in the 12 Angry Men

Jury chief # 1 - He is the head of the jury. He is responsible for keeping order and keeping order smoothly within the scope of the jury. He committed a begging during the begging of the meeting. He is a football coach who talks about how talented players lost in the final round of the season and how they looked at the universe when they lost. The jury # 1 said that he hurt his heart, and after talking he changed his mind and voted in innocence.

Juror # 2 - This is his first jury service. He sinned for the first time. At first it looked like he did not say what he thought, he just makes people talk with him. He was very insightful and he realized that the boy was much shorter than his father. He said ... Read more

Juror # 5 - He is from the project. When others talk about the people of the project, he will be attacked. He sinned at the beginning. But after analyzing the evidence and explaining how you used the boy 's knife correctly, he noticed that the boy was innocent.

Jury # 6 - He first searched for a motive to find out why a boy killed his father. He wants people to respect older gentlemen. He was originally guilty but in the end he voted innocence.

Jury # 7 - He just wants to join his baseball game. Initially he did not care much what he wanted to end the boy. He really did not express his opinion, he just agreed what people said. But when three votes came out he voted innocence and people wanted to hear about his reasons, he said he wants to get this. But then the jury # 11 was angry with him and he told him he was not good enough to speak about his reasons. Then he finally said he believed that the boy did not do this.

Jury # 8 - He wishes people to talk about this before making a decision to end a boy 's life. He always questioned the witness statement. He proved that the old man could not go so fast, he found the same knife near the boy. Competition between judges # 3. He is always guilty.

Carina Verano Pd. 2B 12 Angry person 1. What is the basis of prejudice of these characters? Jury judgment 4 is based on the fact that a trial boy grew up in the slums. The jury was born on the 4th, "I was born in a slum town, the slums are criminal breeding grounds, you know, the threat to society from the slums children is not a secret," he said. The boy is based on his race. Over the movie, he said about a boy ... in a world where the jury is the voice of people's justice, sitting in a room ready to decide the fate of the twelve angry men, the boy's life There are 12 men who are. Did he do it? Otherwise, who did it? Why do young men use spring knives to kill their beloved father? The moment the jury consisted of 12 white men, I felt shy in today's society. They concluded that the young man was condemned innocence.

COMM 132 October 2, 2014 Film Paper (12 angry men) In the movie, asked if 12 angry men, 12 juries committed a crime of murdering his father I will. In order for a man to fulfill his duties as a jury, it is necessary to analyze evidence and testimony and agree on the guilty or innocence of the defendant after reaching an agreement on whether the young man is guilty or not. As an independent group ... 12 angry men are classic films depicting how determined leaders can change the whole crowd. Through devotion, curiosity, pursuit of truth, he can convince a group to guess even 12 people. This homosexual group has more than a dozen different personities - some of them are leaders, but most of them are not. The most powerful leader in this movie is a white suit architect. From the first vote I am an architect