Essay about The Trial of Galileo

The trial of Galileo is a major event in the history of science. We now know that the Roman Catholic Church recognizes that Galileo's view is correct. What is the argument between the two sides on the problem being developed? Search trial online documents and discuss opposition to Galileo litigation during the trial. Make sure to refer to network resources accurately. Your post is about 2 paragraphs and it must be very concise. Finally, is your opinion likely to receive a similar trial in today's civilization? Support your position

Although the faith of Galileo was done against the practice of Catholics, his work showed evidence of "the heart of Copernicus". But the Catholic Church does not agree with the day psychological theory that it is against the Bible 's statement. If God created humanity as his best creation, he will put a person in the center of his universe. (At that time, more literal biblical interpretation was common among the ancestors of the Church, especially in the order of the Dominican Republic, the coordinator of the Inquisition) 2

But true power is in the church, Galileo's claim is most intense at the religious level. Cardinal Robert Bellamin argued that Galileo provided more evidence to prove him new theory before being allowed to teach them that it is the truth or the truth. These ideas should only be taught as assumptions before summarizing the evidence. Pope Gregory XV died in 1623, Galileo's close friend Mafi Barberini became Pope Urban VIII. As long as he did not publicly support his theory, the new pope gave Galileo an ambiguous license to ignore the ban and write a book about his view. Galileo agreed to write his masterpiece "Dialogue on the two major systems of the world" prepared. Galileo emphasizes mathematical discussion rather than experimental or physical proof.

In addition, Galileo's trial took place during the 30-year war and entered a critical phase in the Galileo trial in 1632. The trial may be a reaction to the political pressure of the Spanish papacy city. (Other) By attacking Galileo, the pope can be regarded as a more conservative element, and he is not radical. Probably this is also a hidden way to put political pressure on Galileo's customers, so wealthy and powerful Medici family will not be a war choice.

In 1624 Galileo went to Rome and accepted six interviews with Urban VIII. Galileo told the pope his tide theory (early development), which suggested that he suggested that it was evidence of the Earth Year of the tide and the movement of the day and night. Although the Pope made it possible for Galileo to write a book on the theory of the universe, he warned that he could handle only Copernic's theory hypothetically. In a dialogue between Salviati (on behalf of Galileo), Sagredo (smart layman) and Simplicio (Aristotle dyed wool), Galileo gathered all the arguments (primarily based on his own telescope). Copernicus's theory is opposed to traditional Earth-centered cosmology

In 1616, Galileo visited Rome and met Bellamin. Here, the story is confusing. Bellamin explained that Galileo can use Heliocentric theory as a theoretical teaching, but that is not a fact, he should teach arguments against that theory. Later on, both parties suspected that the un-signed document stated that Bellamin is prohibiting the official teaching of Galileo and writing articles on the theory. This document will serve as evidence of the more famous trial of Galileo in 1632. In any case, Galileo will agree to stop teaching the theory of Copernicus as a fact and will not write it down from such a position.