The topics covered in this article are Esperanto and other artificial languages. Topics of artificial languages are difficult, but interesting topics. This is because most "serious" linguists do not consider artificial languages as real linguistics, thinking they can not have artificial language linguistics. Interesting questions come from studies of artificial languages. Why so many people are trying to abuse the language by "making the language more orderly, more rational and reducing the burden of contradiction and irregularity"
Toki Pona is by no means the first constructor language. There are many people like Esperanto of L. L. Zamenhof who wants to provide an international language for people around the world to communicate. Although Esperanto's design is closer to European languages than other languages, learning is very easy. Because of the limited number, Toky Pona's text has a fair amount of explanation. "Moku" includes things related to food and food, including the word "eat". More specifically, we can add a lot of words. For example, write "watermelon" by adding "kili" (fruit) and "telo" (water) to "kili telo". Of course you can also move them to make "terrorism": using fruit water, or more complicated terms, juice
A more useful constructor language is Esperanto. Esperanto is the so-called "international aid language". It is a language designed to help you learn other languages. Although it can not be said that it is a universal language, it helps to unify different language users like common languages. Esperanto is the largest language constructor and sometimes proves to be useful for learning other languages faster. It is also the job of L. L. Zamenhof, a doctor in Poland. I have made this to show that: 1) a person can make a language; 2) a person does not need to be a linguist (he is convinced that he must be pretty smart But)
For the world, a truly neutral language is Esperanto or an artificially constructed language designed to promote world peace and international exchange. But this is not the main point that I am not neutral about speaking English, I am not here to spread Esperanto around the world. Along with the realization of this fact, we must face another understanding: recognizing that it is never a neutral international language, and there are always multiple languages. Languages are constantly changing, old languages are dead, new languages appear, old languages evolve into new languages, languages are replaced with other languages, this will continue in the history of the rest of humanity , All people do not speak a language.