Equality of Life

I defended the originality and irreducibility of the religious way of life in criticism of rationalism. I believe that advocacy of this faith confirms the fact that different lifestyles are incommunicable. In other words, this defense is diversity and cultural diversity which is not allowed by default. I believe that religious defenders arguing from not catching up with the shape of such life also have to abandon all the traces of the "worldly heresy phobia" that insists that they have the truth about the world I do not think so.

Currently, many peers think that it is acceptable to admit that equality in the sense of equality of living itself is not convincing value, but in the framework of the concept of justice in liberalism Then, its meaning appears in pursuit of other ideals. And complete development of personality, pain relief, overcoming control and shame, contemporary people consistency, freedom society etc (Scanlon 1996). To make matters worse, inequality often means considerable (relative) disadvantage and many (absolute) evils; in principle, these (relative) disadvantages and (absolute) Evil is us. Morality blames the underlying cause of inequality. However, this does not mean inequality itself is evil. Therefore, basic moral ideals other than equality are claimed to support our desire for equality.

Liberals acknowledge that it is impossible to achieve an opportunity of perfectly equal life when compelled. But despite their denial, many people are fascinated by the idea of ​​making life fair and equitable. The basis of modern liberalism is that it is unfair to allow factors beyond individual control to decisively influence their lives. Therefore, even though reluctance to equal opportunities in life, we will not rethink fairness as a guiding ethical principle.

Most Americans may rethink this statement as it seems to capture the fact that many lives in our life do not make a promised promise at birth. In fact, it refers to redefining equality of opportunity as an equal opportunity in life. According to this viewpoint, that position is not only open to anyone, we all should get the same opportunity to win. In addition to having a chance to succeed, there should be the same chance that we all end at the highest level. The meaning of this redefinition is extensive. This claim of equal opportunities in life is based on the assumption that it is unfair for us to be able to control our lives. This assertion includes the denial of God's will and the meaning of the necessity to fully suppress wealth. Every aspect of life should be controlled by humans, so that everyone can shape themselves freely to what they want without being bound by any genealogy or sociology.