Epic hero Comparison

Epic heroes are very strange, two men looking very different can behave like Beowulf and Achilleus. Each has its own honorary principles, enthusiastic need to know actions, and their enemy victories encountered in spectacular battles. The honorary plans of Beowulf and Achilleus are somewhat similar, but they all occur in the fight. For Beowulf, this happened before the fight against the basic beast known as Glendell. Because Glendell does not use weapons, Beowulf decided not to fight beasts with weapons. And Beowulf wants to make the fight fair.

§ 31. After examining the three comparative tables of "Epic Heroes", I reached the point of comparison, the epic of ancient Greece. I suggest starting with the role of Achilles and Odysseus in Homer Iliad and Odyssey. Why are these two magnificent heroes? Though they are not prototypes of the definition of "epic hero", they embody the fusion of the concept of "epic" and "hero" in a particular historical age and place, so they are all typological comparisons It represents an ideal entrance. The time is in the 4th century BC. This place is Athens. Among the works of Plato and Aristotle, this fusion is the most visible, and these works are born from time and place. Here we find an appropriate starting point for system comparison. We must emphasize that this is not a preliminary decision. It is merely historical chance and it is best suited for typological comparison

§ 11. The most extensive typological comparison of the Lord connects traditional epic heroes of ancient Greece, especially Achilles and Odysseus to modern Yugoslavian analogs. This contemporary epic metaphor is related to ancient epics, because typology has no time limit. The same applies to medieval metaphors. In "legendary singer", the typological comparison of the Lord extends to Beowulf of old English, Roland of old French, and Cid of traditional Spanish tradition. .

§13. The type comparison method does not provide a unified definition. In his typological comparison, the Lord can only explain the "hero" using "epic" in the "frame". In other words, we analyze the role of "hero" as a function of plot of "epic". (Through "plot" here, Aristotle used that word in his poet, so I mean muthos.) In this regard, at least, the compound "epic hero" is sufficient typology Continue to provide a comparison point. Even simple terms such as "epic" and "hero" do not appear to be suitable for me.

"Odyssey" is an epic consisting of Homer, an early Greek narrator. This epic is the foundation of Greek and Roman education. Epic is a long poem characterized by adventure. The epic hero is a magnificent hero. A magnificent hero is a tall person, perhaps a historical or legendary figure. The most outstanding qualities of magnificent heroes are usually the most important qualities of magnificent society. The main character of this epic is Odysseus. Odysseus is trying to find his hometown hero at Sophocles' Oedipus King ',' Homer's Odyssey ', and Tan' s "The Joy Luck Club". In world literature, there are two types of prototype principals, mythical heroes and tragic heroes. Like Homer's Odysseus, the mythical hero represents a combination of superhuman virtue and human imperfection. These qualities create a realistic supernatural adventure. Mythical heroes are endorsed by the power of God and will ultimately accomplish the goal or complete the journey