Ensuring Freedom

Throughout the historical process, the freedom aspects of American citizens' eyes are surprisingly contradictory. With the formulation of "Declaration" and "Constitution" in the early days of our country, we are constantly pursuing elements of freedom. However, looking back on the gentle written intent of this document, it can be said that freedom is not for everyone. The "declaration" promised to have caused only a civil war from the voice of minorities representing minority ethnic groups, although it was originally a document that "everyone was born equally" (American Declaration Industry Index) ing.

Americans are proud to live in democracy guaranteeing freedom, but how correct is this assumption? What is today's freedom? How does it affect us? The Webster English Dictionary defines freedom as "a state that acts without interruption or restraint and can act freely." The truth of the problem is that the United States is not completely free country. Every year, a new law is passed, all of which are invasions into our daily lives. One law I strongly disagree is tobidding smoking. New York's house does not smoke on bars, restaurants, offices, covered outdoor terraces. The government should not have the right to tell an independent company about how to operate. Passive smoking is harmful, but I decided to go to a place where smoking is permitted. People go to the bar to relax and have a good time, now smokers prefer to stay home, they do not have to go out every 15 minutes

Essay.com/ This is an example article on law, I do not agree with this: smoking bans, mobile phone ban on driving, and age of drinking besides age 21.

No smoking, no cell phone during driving, and age of drinking must be 21 years or younger.

Does democracy guarantee freedom? I believe that democracy can guarantee freedom, but that is not always the case, so my answer may be so. Because democracy is a form of government that depends on the legal system that individuals are treated equally and simultaneously through elections, staff who behave according to the interests of the members and express concerns can enter the legislation process fairly. By appropriately protecting legislation, we can protect individuals. However, as the democratic nature profits the majority, politicians are more likely to win a seat in response to the mass vote.

Increasing the degree of freedom of control and even ensuring it is not usually for the benefit of the government. It is governance by guaranteeing freedom through constant struggle with the government. This struggle is not necessarily successful or direct, but from a free point of view there seems to be a historical direction aimed at reducing violence and oppression. In most cases, progress has been made in several areas or several places at the same time, and there has always been a recession in other areas, and people constantly promoting destruction and destruction freedom of others Yes. In advanced countries, you can not use violence to suppress protest action for no reason Slavery, sexism, racial discrimination is illegal unless it is eradicated.