Ending Human

Suddenly he was held by his wife. A few seconds later, she let him go. "Sorry," the deep voice behind Jason was threatened. Suddenly his right shoulder badly hurt, he fell to the ground, and the blood flowed out of the hole he just made. A huge robot man is kneeling beside him. "Your God has left you." When I fainted, the last time I saw Alexander was dragged by a man wearing a scarf, and there was a big guy next to him It was that. This time, Jason woke up in a place more familiar.

This is the idea that we have seen over and it became a cliche. The scope of these stories includes threats to consider to end human's complete war (considered HAL in 2001) and killing (a story when computerized creatures become wise) It usually ends very badly with human involvement. At the end of the spectrum, Hawking did not bypass the bushes. "The development of perfect artificial intelligence may mean the demise of humanity," he said. Hawking is interested in the idea of ​​sensory artificial intelligence. This type of intelligence can "redesign itself with a constantly increasing rate" and human beings can not compete with it because they are "limited by slow biological evolution".

... Why are many of the world's smartest people now so worried? Bill Gates said, "Why some people do not care about the reasons why Steven Hawking might" end the demise of humanity ", he said. The theory of ethics proposed by the fable is simple: people in the fable have obvious and convincing moral reasons to get rid of the dragon. Our situation on human aging is very similar to that of Dragon's fable and is morally homogeneous. Therefore, we have a convincing moral reason to get rid of human aging

Why do humans end other people's lives? For this type of media, this question is too broad, so let's explain this background again. "Why did a person decide to end the lives of one or more people intimately?" There is some intimacy in large-scale shooting incidents in advance. A battleship commander bumps into an enemy's commander and an individual's shooting and explodes the bomb, or drives the car through an emotional and human connection between the crowd. However, there is a direct correlation between mass killing and violent violence due to poverty. That is connected with happiness of human beings. Of course, prohibiting the use of firearms may reduce the number of people. Banning guns can even reduce the number of accidents, as it is more difficult to achieve the illusion of suicide bombing terrorism and other methods of death. However, attempts to strengthen control over firearms can only solve these symptoms and deepen differences in our country. Depressed, drink this medicine