Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate

In addition to previous versions of this chapter, five scholars participated as Pike 's debaters.

Argument,. . The other person is considered to be an opponent. . . [Meet a conversation] one

The first job was to master each other's position in the strongest light. . . I can do it

Try to strengthen mutual discussion as much as possible to streamline. . . 【One】

In the 1960 's he used the idea of ​​emic / etic (Pike 1967: 34, 54), he was barely reading Harris' work.

Main - a conceptual tool for their trading. Therefore, the difference between emic / etic is one of the basic problems.

Nearby interesting things were noted in the rest of us. Later, when the driver asks us

An important function is "Especially because it does not define etic at all! 1989 20 volumes

Pike .... [Etic:] belongs to either the raw data of one language or the other action field.

Restrictions) terms, their original meaning, and their readers think that the metaphor is useful. so

[Only] There are in the neighborhood. . . . I do not think that emic and etic are related differences. "I

A major anthropological journal (for example, the latest question received during the writing of this article)

72% of the text quotes Pike, Harris, and someone else to discuss their concepts, while 28%

It belongs to all of us, not just Parker and Harris. I think this is good for discipline. So

Other people define and use the difference of emic / etic, I think that is anthropology

** The number of references displayed between 1986 and 1989 was small. Many of the recent publications were not so.

Mainly in the definition of actors, beliefs, values, and ideologies (1970: 82 - 83). Meanwhile, Harris

4. The seven articles mentioned in H.C.C. P. It is the first volume of Brislin, Leonard and Triandis. 1, berry,

1970, 1974). By the way, Algeo clearly points out that "Pike is the meaning of the term" in these two papers (1974: 3)

(The difference of emic / etic was originally proposed by anthropologist Pike in 1954 and later applied to intercultural psychology. The etic approach to cultural research is a commonly accepted search technique for external research In contrast, the emic approach involves studying culture from within and trying to treat it as a member of its own (Troiden-1989-Gay identity development model explained four phases. Do: Sensitization, identity confusion, identity assumption, and identity commitment Including homosexual emotions and experiences, sensitivity does not begin to understand before puberty from a self-awareness perspective Sensitivity of identity, It is usually found between teenagers around the age of 17 and women around the age of 18. During the identity hypothesis, individuals are homosexual Jar in looks - usually men 19 to 21 years of age, women are 21 to 23 years old

Etic - "Outsiders bring out their own structures - their own expressions - partly superimposing the internal view into the internal view, interpret the internal structure according to the external starting point, Approach "(Pike, 1986 - Harris quoted, 1990: 49). Globalization - Complex Internet where life is increasingly influenced by long-term decisions and events; globalization reflects the expansion of the penetration of nation-states (Heywood, 2003: 332). Religious and other interactions between road agencies and human lives are part of the global scale rather than regional or regional contexts (Smart, 1996: xvii)

Some people think emotion and language itself are conflicts, but people may tend to exclude others, but the complementarity of emic and etic's methods in anthropological research, especially on human characteristics It is widely recognized in fields of interest. And the shape and function of human social system. ... Emic's knowledge and interpretation exists in culture and is explained by "culture, local culture, meaning and belief" (Ager and Loughry, 2004: np), preferably by "native" culture . Echic knowledge is a generalization of cultural practices that are considered to be universal and it is important to consider cultural practices to be of interest to researchers, such as those considered to be irrelevant by cultural insiders I often associate. , 1999)