Emergent Systems – Religion Versus Science

Emergent system - Religious versus science Religion is an institution that demands an unobservable and impossible existence to explain the natural world. Provide a default description for what is not currently understood. During the past several thousand years, unknown quantities declined exponentially due to religious monopoly on their causes and methods. Today, religion is rarely used to explain reality. When someone had a seizure he could not pierce his head. When our children ascertain the origin of AIDS and lightning, we no longer answer "God". We now have a wonderful array of social science and natural sciences.

They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam

Consideration of the following scientific and religious arguments may provide reasons for accepting the coexistence of science and religion in the same "order of things". While various points and differences have been confirmed, there are some indications that there is a possibility that accepting both at the same time may be a prospect of compatibility that is actually adopted. Where the truth must be considered to be very complex, scientific truths and spiritual truths can be allowed to fully accept their common validity. I hope that science and religion are complementary within a sufficient time and are seen as not conflicting.