Effects of BackGround Music on Phonological Short-Term Memory

Improving recall was the goal of many scientific research (Higbee, 2001; Lachman, Weaver, Bandura, Elliot, and Lewkowicz, 1992). As a result, the best way to achieve this goal was discussed. In this research we decided to focus only on two ways of emotional state and emotional discourse. The emotional state or mood of that person is important (Happiness-Levine & Burgess, 1997; Thaut & l'Etoile, 1993) since emotions affect the memory of that person's information when searching for memories. Depending on the type of music, it helps to induce or change the mood of a person (Rickard, 2012).

To further clarify the irrelevant sound effects, this research attempts to explore irrelevant sound effects, ie background music, in a wider context. Specifically, I am interested in extending the application of voice loops and assumptions of change state to the context of music. With reference to these two theories, we will try to study musical properties that determine the destructive effectiveness of background music against our verbal short-term memory performance. Among them, this research is trying to study two musical attributes. The first music attribute is vocal music. In previous studies, there was no systematic control of potential confounding factors between vocalized and nonvoiced states, so this study took several steps to eliminate possible confusion.

Given that accompaniment music becomes more common and short-term memory is considered as the basis of skilled cognitive functions, examining the effect of background music in an unrelated sound effect paradigm provides important implications . If it turns out that a particular type of music is particularly harmful to short-term speech, it helps to make informed choices when choosing the appropriate type of BGM.

BGM is very similar to unrelated sounds, neither of which has anything to do with immediate tasks, but BGM affects the short-term memory performance of the language, creating a "music independent sound effect" Do you? Therefore, it is an important application problem. . In addition, because the voice cycle hypothesis and the state change hypothesis suggest that certain sounds may be more harmful, applying these two theories to the background music background may cause either type of It helps to explain whether music becomes more harmful for language phrases. Effectiveness Term memory

Since the speech cycle assumes that speech is the cause of interference in short term speech, the more the auditory stimulus resembles speech, the more destructive it is. Therefore, proof of music independent sound effects to prove the rhyme loop hypothesis thus requires a sound (more like sound music) and a background music (music like sound) condition other than sound . Previous work using this experimental design method provided consistent evidence to support the hypothesis that vocal music is more destructive to memory ability than non-vocal music.