This study extends the current literature and examines the effectiveness of interventions in university students and college students in physical activity, nutrition, weight loss behavior. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first systematic review of student health behavior in higher education environments. There are some restrictions on areas to be recognized. First, since the majority of research in the United States is taking place in the United States, the interpretation of the results and the global universality may be restricted. Second, only 4 out of 41 studies meeting the selection criteria achieved a positive result in meeting the risk of criteria for validity bias. Furthermore, the gray literature (eg unpublished thesis) is not included in the findings of this review, so you need to consider the potential impact of publication bias.
There are several advantages to this review. It uses a comprehensive search strategy, follows the PRISMA protocol, and two reviewers use research identification and evaluation [30]. Meta analysis of physical activity
Students receiving higher education among universities are ideal targets for lifestyle intervention aimed at improving healthy behavior. In these circumstances, students are often surrounded by abundant research experts, interdisciplinary medical experts, world class facilities and resources. In addition, students are in the learning environment and are still at the age to be able to improve the healthy behavior affecting health in the second half of life. Therefore, there is ample room to implement lifestyle intervention to improve the health of this group, which is the majority of our population.
In systematic review and meta-analysis, to determine the impact of school-based physical activity intervention on children's body mass index (BMI), Harris and colleagues said that increasing the number of schools is necessary for current population-based policies I have concluded. Sports Activities Significant impact on the incidence of childhood obesity. Meta-analysis showed that BMI was not ameliorated by physical activity intervention. In contrast, Swedish studies by Marcus et al. Determined that school-based intervention could reduce obesity in children aged 6-10 years and may affect family eating habits. In a study of 3,135 men and women, we found that the prevalence of obesity and overweight decreased by 3.2% in schools that attempted intervention.
This study extends the current literature and examines the effectiveness of interventions in university students and college students in physical activity, nutrition, weight loss behavior. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first systematic review of student health behavior in higher education environments. There are some restrictions on areas to be recognized. First, since the majority of research in the United States is taking place in the United States, the interpretation of the results and the global universality may be restricted. Second, only 4 out of 41 studies meeting the selection criteria achieved a positive result in meeting the risk of criteria for validity bias. Furthermore, the gray literature (eg unpublished thesis) is not included in the findings of this review, so you need to consider the potential impact of publication bias.
Effectiveness of university students and university students on physical activity, nutrition and weight intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis
Physical activity intervention is another major pillar of obesity treatment. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that diet and diet and exercise intervention alone resulted in weight loss and improved metabolic properties (102). However, it has been pointed out that increased momentum in dietary intervention results in greater improvement in HDL cholesterol, fasting blood glucose and fasting insulin levels (102). Over the past two decades, several pediatric clinics have focused on specialized clinics focusing on the management of overweight / obese children and adolescents. Several of these clinics are supported by research / clinical support grants. Establishing similar centers at each institution may not be realistic or feasible. Therefore, other solutions need to be developed.