Education without Truth in Postmodern Perspectivism

After Nietzsche criticizes Western rationalism, it blames the pursuit of truth by justifying various arguments at the level of universal human value by obscuring the indirect compulsion of his discourse and image . . Postmodern thinkers should convert philosophical thinking into an emotional academic field (Roti) or learning, under the influence of post-structuralism relativism, using perspective as a debate over the philosophical basis of various models and schemes I will try. Otta is released from the cognitive tradition. From knowledge to discourse

Postmodern authors such as Lyotard (1984) and Rorty (1989) share Fucor with the idea that knowledge is not metaphysical, transcendental, universal, but specific time and space. In the case of postmodernism, knowledge has a perspective on personality - that nobody can grasp the characteristics of the "goal" of the world. Instead, we have multiple ideas and truths, and we need them to explain the existence of complex and heterogeneous human beings. Therefore post-modern thinks knowledge as follows.

Postmodern doubts the core assumption of modernism. According to postmodernism, the truth is not just the essential nature of statements that accurately attribute assets to the world. Facts are not limited to facts that can be confirmed by rational and empirical scientific methods. Instead, post-modernists are convinced that there are other ways to learn - through emotion and intuition in addition to reason. Post modernists regard the world as a history, relationship, individual, and participation, not as an area of ​​dominance without humanity.

"Modern" in "postmodern" means not to appeal to emotions and traditions, but to truth through objective reason and science methods. "Postmodernism" is often used to refer to people who believe there is no objective truth, but our equipment is only used to make people agree with us. In this sense, the cards are post modernists. But Post-Modern thinkers like Foucault accepted the idea of ​​objective truth. But they point out that practices and institutions that claim to be based on scientific truth tend to turn to not only truth but to ask for power. In particular, we believe that Foucault believes that it is a scientifically enlightened way to improve society is not often to give power to those who claim to help us I am worried.