Education Can End Systematic Oppression

Sitting through the doorway is a room filled with people. Everyone is fundamentally different, but they are gathering for one purpose: to receive higher education. The general purpose of education is to encourage people to further develop themselves to ensure the future. For some people, salary at the end of the road is the only incentive. For other people, the motivating factor is the ability to improve oneself and society. The first group, salary group, is not interested in improving oneself.

Education raising a problem can not contribute to the benefit of oppressors, or can not. Suppressive orders can not cast doubts on suppressed people. Only a revolutionary society can do such education systematically, but revolutionary leaders need not have full power before adopting this approach. In the course of the revolution, leaders can not use the banking law as a temporary measure and have been proved by two. This concept corresponds to what Sartre calls the concept of "digestion" or "nutrition" education. There, knowledge is provided by educators. The teacher asked the students to "be full". See Jean-Paul Sartre's "Hutong Realist Foundation: L'intentalite" 1 (Paris, 1947).

But, if the implementation of liberalization education requires political power and the oppressor is not, how can you implement the pedagogy of oppressors before the revolution? This is one of the most important issues, and its response is outlined at least initially in Chapter 4. One aspect of this correspondence is that in distinguishing between system education and educational program, systemic education can be changed only by political power. Should be done with someone who is under pressure on the organization process