The analysis of militarism by eco feminism and the war with terrorism has become a very important issue since it began to retaliate against terrorism, war, and the military industry complex that supports war. While attaining its main goal, the war also destroyed innocent people. War hit the young, the elderly, the women and the children. In the war country, the environment was partially destroyed. The view of feminist and environmentalist helps to analyze militarism and its control and oppression policy.
Eco feminists have a broad perspective of militarism, hierarchy, and society transcending natural destruction, but as with feminism itself, often have different analyzes and strategies to achieve them. In many ways, the political style of ecological feminism is the concept of "resistance of the region" to power relations. Eco feminists interpret power as "not concentrating, being diverse and constantly replicated" or "multiple power relations." Eco feminism emphasizes local behavioralism, but it also maintains the importance of a global perspective.
In the West, the second wave of women's movement premised on seeing relationships of militarism, sexism, racial discrimination, racial discrimination, and environmental destruction emerged as a concern for Eco Feminist's behaviorism It is. By the mid-1930s, many women who promised direct action against militarism began to name their eco feminists as interdependence depicting their political concerns. With the evolution of eco feminism, in an effort to reorganize nature / cultural binaryism it is based on other toxic waste, deforestation, military and nuclear weapons policy, reproductive rights and technology, liberation of animals, domestic and foreign agriculture I adopted development. It is a question. However, eco feminism is very different in the claim that inhumanism is a concern of feminists. Eco feminist theory uses the principles of ecology and feminism to provide information on their political groups and their efforts to create a fair and environmentally friendly lifestyle.
Alternative opposition between Islamic terrorism and civilization is to disseminate passion and disastrous emotions and discourse of war mainly to support forms of military intervention. I believe that this one-dimensional militarism does not offer a solution to the global terrorism problem but may exacerbate the current crisis. Therefore, the democratic media should critically discuss the imminent problems confronting the country, but in the crisis of terrorism, mainstream American media, especially television, war for the global terror Insist on hot spots and military solutions.