Duty to Protect vs Patient Confidentiality

Tatiana Tarasoff, a student at the University of California at Berkeley, on October 27, 1969 returned to Brazil in the summer and was assassinated several times by the student Prosenjit Poddar. It is as tragic as the crime itself, and even more tragic is that it can be prevented. Podder had an unhealthy obsession with Miss Thalassov in the year before her death. She constantly refused to make progress and made him deeply depressed. My friend recommended encouraging him to get treatment at the university's Student Health Center.

Even in the world where human rights organizations are very active, there is a debate that "Is there a legal obligation to protect or alert a third party?" The confidentiality of the relationship between the doctor and the patient is very important, but there are cases where it is necessary to consider the risks of others. In this case, it was thought that the psychologist was responsible for warning that the victim of the killings and their families were threatening to kill her; he was undergoing psychotherapy. Information gained during this period, generally related to HIV status, is generally considered

Even if the patient does not see or receive treatment from that particular doctor, confidentiality obligation will continue. Responsibility survived even the death of the patient. This means that even if the patient dies, his or her medical records and information are still protected by the doctor's confidentiality. Your medical record tells you a lot and you can not share them without your consent. If you still need information about the difference between confidentiality and privacy, or if you need to serve as a proxy immediately, you do not need to look so far. Today, please start this process with a free preliminary case review by medical malpractice attorneys