Drug Testing Student Athletes - Influential or Useless?

Drug examination student athlete - influential or useless. As the International Olympic Committee (IOC) states, "Competitors who manage or use all foreign objects are unfair to the body or inject substances into the competition area" (Yesalis 1). Basically, athletes who decided to use all sorts of materials should be regarded as bad winners in the field of competition, and that many people shorten their approach, not for better achievement Please pick up so please pick up.

Especially for student athlete. The school started a drug examination of student athletes around 1995. In 2002, the court enacted a law requiring high school students to take drug tests. There are several inspection methods using hair, urine, oral fluid, sweat. Urinalysis is the most common type of drug testing. Discussions about narcotics student athletes are still growing among people. Drug examination student athlete supporter thinks that drug use of student athlete is possible

In Hill v. NCAA 's 1994 case, the California Supreme Court ruled that the examination of university student athletes is constitutional. Plaintiffs were two student athletes from Stanford University who thought that student athletes random drug test infringed the California State Constitution's privacy right. The California Supreme Court, California provides privacy to citizens, but university students are volunteering to participate in health checkups of changing rooms and other people, desire to take off their clothes and share medical care, so privacy It is judged that expectation is low. Physical condition, trainer and coach

Americans have always respected their privacy, so there are several cases to raise random drug testing to challenge students. However, the US Supreme Court has found that the random drug test of the student athlete does not infringe the privacy right of the fourth revision. In the Vernonia School District against Acton lawsuit in 1995, the Supreme Court supported the district's policies and asked the students to agree to a randomized drug test for participation in sports. The Court believes that it is reasonable to conduct random drug tests of student athletes because the expectation of the student athlete's privacy is lower than that of the general population and there is a risk of injury caused by athlete's drug use I judged that there was.

In the Oregon school district, a hearing by the US Supreme Court was held by student athlete drug tests. In the Vernonia School District, all student athletes from the 7th grade to the 12th grade must participate in drug test policy. According to Phelps (1995) of the Washington Bureau, forced urine analysis requires the boys to provide samples in the toilet bowl, the teacher observes from behind and the girls personally provide samples so that the outside of the booth I asked him. Interruption of drug education seminars or teams between two sports seasons means that their test results are a good result