Dred Scott v. Sanford

Dred Scott, an African-American born slavery, requests something for all slaves, their freedom. They are abused, ignored, treated as wealth, not as human beings. In 1852, Dred Scott sued Sanford's current boss, Sanford. He was no longer a slave but a free man (Oyez 1). Article 4 of the Constitution stipulates that any slave who steps into free land makes himself a free person. This controversy led to the judgment of the state court and ultimately the final decision of the Supreme Court.

Dred Scott v. Sanford - Dred Scott is a slave in Missouri, went to Wisconsin in Free State, then returned to Missouri, claiming that the residence on his free land will no longer slaughter him. The Supreme Court adjudged Dread Scott and ruled that the Missouri compromise violated Constitutional illegal slavery in Wisconsin and other northern regions. Announcement of amnesty and reconstruction - swear allegiance to the alliance, as long as the sovereign who accepts the release of slaves is given full presidential amnesty. It also stipulates that only 10% of national voters need a pledge of loyalty to allow the country to join the league again.

In 1857, according to Dred Scott v. Sanford's decision, the US Supreme Court rejected civil rights of all slaves, former slaves and slave descendants, denying that Congress had the right to prohibit slavery in the territory did. The most important result of Dred Scott's decision was a statement by Roger B. Tenny, presiding judge that the Negro has always been considered 'the only property' through American history. His subsequent remarks reverberated throughout the history of America and cried in American history. White supremacist, "Blacks do not have the right to whom white people should respect."

Abraham Lincoln called it "amazing in the history of the law" 1, and still Dred Scott vs. Sanford who is most famous among all the judicial decisions in the United States. Since this is the first invalidation of the main federal law by the Supreme Court, this is a breakthrough in the history of judicial review. In fact, this decision quickly showed that if political issues were transformed into constitutional issues, they could create enormous jurisdiction. Dred Scott versus Sanford can claim to have been used to raise greater problems for political influences. I am convinced that this is absolutely true, and from the evidence it will try to show that the Supreme Court Secretary Taney is a tool for this type of political transport. Furthermore, in addition to the political conspiracy of Tani and other famous people, Dred Scott vs Sanford is still small but harmless.