"The purpose of this article is to present a general discussion of the vastly immoral majority of deliberate abortion" (183)
"Abortion opponents have not accused irrationally that they can not tolerate the principle of killing support too narrowly; it is too broad and unacceptable to support a selector to condemn murder anti-abortion principles.
"If a supporter asks the anti-abortion to explain the relationship between human physiological characteristics and the murderers killed, the anti-abortors are justified and clearly state the psychological standards to the supporters as a person As you call on ... Connections between murdered mistakes ... ... (187)
What was wrong? This is a core problem: killing us deprives us of the future value. Due to our current taste, later values and the values that we will emerge, it is not only to deprive the value we have today and in the future. (190)
Some of the meanings of Marquis for the core error characteristics of killing are as follows (Marquis used these hints to support accounts (190))
The moral category that is decisively important in Marques' debate is neither a person nor a potential person. It is like a category with "a valuable future like us" (192)
In order to conclude that the majority of abortion is wrong, Marquez does not need to show that the necessary conditions to kill a certain mistake is that it deprives future values like ours. The only condition he needs to prove to kill a specific error is that it deprives its value. (194-195)
The necessary condition for the mistake of killing people is that doing so prevents the realization of the desire for people to continue to live. But the fetus does not want to keep on living. There is no problem to kill. (195-196)
Only the victim can do suspicious things. Victims must have a feeling. But the embryo does not feel. Therefore, embryos are not victims and can not be treated unjustly. Therefore, embryo abortion is not wrong. (199)
Contrary to what Marquez said, it is wrong not to deprive the future from our value. If Marquez 's assertion is true, contraception is wrong. this is foolish. (201)
The argument against the strongest opposition pointed out to the Marquis of Tang "Why abortion is immoral?" He concluded that "abortion is wrong because the fetus possesses property and adults possess property to kill adults." After reviewing the discussion, English articles are closest to my view. It provides self-protection privileges and is called self-defense in English. Since the Roe vs. Wade incident in 1973, abortion is legal in the United States and this case is a woman who chooses to stop pregnancy due to personal reasons (economic problems, unreasonable childbirth, age or sexual crime) . At any point in the early pregnancy, there are limits in mid-pregnancy and mid-pregnancy in many states.
What is abortion is to kill the fetus in the womb of the mother. According to Don Marquis, killing the fetus is not morally acceptable. Marquez advocated the claim that abortion is immoral and can only be accepted rarely. - Because abortion is considered a sensitive topic in society, it is often not mentioned or discussed. However, Marquez decided to comment on this issue. Marquez believes abortion is very immoral. However, he mentioned exceptions that can be accepted in rare cases but in some cases. It can be inferred that these situations include situations where mothers or children are at severely compromised by breeding the fetus.