Does Theory of Mind Exist at the Age of Three

Introduction The theory of mind (ToM) is defined as "to recognize our own psychological processes and the psychological processes of others" (Ciccarelli, 2013). According to Apperly (2012), Astington & Huges (2013) and Wellman (2011), interest in nature starts at a very young age. A 3 year old child must be able to perceive and understand through observation (Pratt & Bryant, 1990) and distinguish between positive / negative feelings and the desire to distinguish one person from others.

Both of the above theories are considered to be reasonable explanations for the theory of children's mind. However, there seems to be insufficient evidence for this claim. Since the theory of mind is defined as the ability to understand the beliefs of others, this will not happen until 4 years old (Perner, 1991). Another important point is that the initial ability may be a pioneer of the true mind theory, but this does not mean there is no change after four years. Gopnik, Slaughter & Meltzoff (1994) proposed four conceptual changes in the development of mind theory. It proves that the theory of fully developed mind does not show up in the times.

Since the beginning of philosophical thinking, humans have tried to answer this ancient question. Among these wonderful ideas are French mathematicians, scientists and religious philosopher Blaze Pascal. As a mathematician, Blaise Pascal is known for his own Pascal Triangle (some Chinese find the same thing) and other mathematical works. As a scientist, he invented hydraulic presses and syringes. He also worked a lot on stress, so he is the name of the pressure unit. As a religious philosopher, Blais Pascal investigated the existence of God and presented different answers to any other philosopher he had previously.

Many philosophers have been discussing to support the existence of God. French mathematician Blaise Pascal made a reasonable argument about the existence of God. He said that there is no existence of God. If we believe in God and he is present, we will receive eternal return to heaven. If God does not exist, what we most overlook is sinful happiness. If we do not believe in God and he is present, we may have to face eternity of hell to gain a few sinful pleasures. If we do not believe in God and he does not exist, it will have no effect on our crime. After explaining these points, Pascal did this question. Whatever reasonable gamblers do you think that sinful and happy experience deserves eternal pain?