Does Knowledge Lead to Liking?

Whether it will lead to knowledge. If so, that is the benefit of the connection. According to a general view, when you learn more about someone, you like them. Many people studied whether it is true or not. Norton, Frost and Ariely (2007) studied this and found the opposite. Reis, Maniaci, Caprariello, Eastwick, Finkel (2011a) studied the same subject and found that more and more knowledge leads the desire for life interaction. Both groups of authors are linked directly from knowledge and preferences.

One of the most important ladders of the Summit is knowledge. The more we know, the higher we are. But where do we start? Everyone can not know everything - in fact, our knowledge accumulation grows rapidly and no one can keep up with it. It is like going into the Congress library, millions of books and trying to decide which book to read first. People can wear the latest methods and present a very attractive look. It's still quite good for now. But when he opened his mouth speaking, he announced his level above the pyramid to the world. George Bernard Shaw 's play "Pygmalion" was later incorporated into the musical "My Fair Lady". This is an extreme example of what I am talking about.

Knowledge is power. Historian Diane Rabic wrote in an article in the New York Times magazine "Decline and Decline of Educational History" in 1985, "Understanding history does not mean that everyone can do it." It is the same conclusion, but it allows people to master knowledge. Make an independent judgment on the current problem. Without a historical view, voters are more likely to be emotionally appealed.

Hypotheses can lead to experiments, both of which can lead to theory. Sometimes we call it "law" or "knowledge" if the theory of evidence provides an accurate forecast every time. However, "knowledge" does not mean it is absolute. Facts and theories may change in the future and you may have to change your knowledge to adapt to changing evidence. Unfortunately, many people believe abusing the concept of logic and providing a way to get "the truth" about the world; if they come up with a logical argument, it is in some way It will be effective for external events. But the logic itself does not say anything to the world, nor does it guarantee "truth". Logic provides a language of self - reasoning, but it is only relevant to its own composition. In fact, logical conclusion based on reasonable reasoning may not be consistent with external events we want to understand. For example, in the following logical structure,