Does Aristotle’s Function Argument Offer a Convincing Account of the Human Good?

Aristotle's "Niccombe Ethics" represents his most important contribution in the field of ethics; it is a collection of ten books covering a wide range of interesting topics throughout the series. Aristotle is trying to understand the general understanding of human interests, exploring the causes of human behavior, and finding the most common end goal of human behavior. Indeed, the morality of Aristotle is also being investigated through psychological and spiritual areas of mankind.

In particular, Aristotle's debate version caused a lot of criticism, some of which are described in the next section. In this article we will use Aristotle's metaphysical and psychological work while providing the meaning of Aristotle's "function" and human function. Then I reconstructed Aristotle's argument based on the result. My purpose is to show that you can answer many objections raised if you obey function arguments and understand it properly. I will explain the reasons below, so the theoretical structure of Nick's morality will collapse without it, so I think functional discussions should be well understood. Part of the defense is conditional, and if a person has a metaphysical belief in Aristotle, it only indicates that the arguments of the function look as natural and obvious as it looks.

In Nicomachean Ethics of Ethics 7, Aristotle insists that human functions must be decided in order to discover the interests of mankind. He thinks human function is a reasonable activity. Therefore, our advantage is that reasonable activities will go well, and Aristotle believes that this means virtue. Almost all the issues criticize this argument. This chapter adheres to Aristotle's arguments from these criticisms. I believe that it uses Aristotle's shape and the metaphysical description of matter, and "function" does not mean a purpose but a way of working - how an object fulfills its role. The way humans do things is to make a reasonable choice. Human beauty and happiness is not only the result of rational choice, but because rational actions and activities are concepts of expressing what an entity is worth for an agent.