Doctor-Assisted Suicide and the Hospitals' Bottom Line

Discussion about euthanasia, and important factors of hospital revenue on medical and treatment strategies are costs. Providing state-of-the-art medical care provided by modern hospitals is very expensive. Concern about the source of funds to take care of the elderly seems to make the case of "euthanasia" even more convincing. Under economic pressure, hospitals exercise the right to refuse to offer such expensive medical services to elderly or seriously ill patients.

This line directly rebuts the doctor's idea of ​​supporting another life to kill suicide. By facilitating doctors to help suicide, doctors promise that they are the best therapists they can do. Essentially, this harms their reliability and the reputation of doctors. Objection to this view, due to the harmless request of Hippocratic Oath, the doctor can end the patient's life when the patient suffers. They argue that the pain and suffering of terminal disease are more harmful to patients than to aid patient death (Humphry). The problem is in the definition of harmless. Hippocrates wishes that doctors can heal their patients instead of killing them. Hippocrates' covenant revealed that it should not carry out suicide assistance for deadly drugs and other forms ("Greek medicine"). Ignoring these principles violates Hippocrates' s pledge and decreases the reliability and character of the doctor. state

Assisted suicide is defined as a suicide done with the help of another person (sometimes a doctor). It also applies outside medical conditions, such as when providing a weapon or other means to help a suicide person achieve his death. "Assistant suicide" has been used to explain the death of medical assistance in the United States. This is suitable for adults with psychiatric disorders self-administering drugs to shorten their death process. This term is often used interchangeably with doctor suicide (PAS), "doctor's death", "doctor's death", "doctor's death" and "death remedy" in the same sense.