Genetic factors are likely to show violent behavior to people. Many doctors and researchers in the field of genetics are looking for answers to this question. From 1989 to 93, a researcher named Dr. Sullivan discovered some interesting ideas on genetics and crime. When Sullivan took office as the Minister of Health and Social Welfare of the Bush administration from 1989 to 1993, he was shocked by the epidemic of violent crime that occurred in cities in the United States. According to Dr. Sullivan, "More than 26,000 Americans were murdered and 6 million violent crimes were the most common among young men and minorities."
Those who decide criminal acts They were born to produce killers, genes, or learning behaviors. From genetic factors to environmental factors, there are many factors leading to criminal activity. Some believe and believe that criminal activity is biologically decisive, but criminal behavior still has more learning and environmental factors. There are four social risk factors that are thought to involve crime. - In this article we will look at the concept that anyone can become a criminal. When discussing this problem, I will discuss the problem of "criminals make something criminals". Defining a crime is inherently difficult. Because it can be thought of as a wide range of actions ranging from tasting fruits in the market to cursing frustrated people.
In order to fulfill the title "criminal researchers find criminal genes", we will ask many questions and doubts about the legality of this discovery. How can a society define a crime when a person is caused to commit a crime by a gene? The law determines what is regarded as criminal behavior and morality. If society defines what crime is, how does a crime go through a gene? If a crime is transmitted through a gene, society can not define what the crime is. "Criminologists use various research methods to measure the nature and extent of criminal activity" (20). This is the result of the crime being an action. I think personality traits, ethics and values can pass through the gene pool; but I think that crime is a matter of people's choice. Crime is the result of action, I do not think it is inherited. As for crime it is an option, genes never lead to crime.
If evolution can help explain violent crime, genes must make a significant contribution to this behavior change. In other words, if the gene is not at least partially involved in this property, the property can not evolve by natural selection. This means that some people genetically tilt more acting in ways defined as crime than others. In order to explore this possibility, researchers use two different methods: behavioral genetics and molecular genetics.