Do we Aspire to Democracy, or is Democracy Something Achieved?

There are various governance systems such as democracy, authoritarianism, authoritarianism, autocracy, autocracy, autocracy, absoluteism, traditionism, monarchy, oligarchism, politicalism, aristocracy, and Sudanism. In all governance systems, democracy is the only system that takes into account the rights of people. In all other forms, power is given to individuals or individuals due to wealth or birth rights. According to Dahl's democracy, "the ruler is a governance system that is responsible for the behavior of citizens indirectly through public competition and chosen representatives' competition and cooperation" (4).

"Program code democratization democracy" - a bold statement from the group you may not have heard. So who are we, where did we come from? A fair question from experienced viewers! First of all, a bit of history. When the presidential election season of 2016 began in the spring of 2015, 3,000 volunteer engineers who claimed to be Sanders coders helped to promote Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign decentralized non-hierarchical online We formed a community. And by giving them permanent powers to weaken politics. Technology Alliance:

Liquid democracy is a subset of democracy and a powerful voting model for collective decision making in large communities. Liquid democracy combines the advantages of direct democracy and representative democracy to build a true democratic voting system that enables voters to vote directly on issues and delegate voting rights to trusted parties. By giving authority, people with domain-specific knowledge can have a better effect on the outcome of the decision and lead to better governance throughout the country. For this reason, Liquid Democracy will naturally evolve into elite politics. The decision is made primarily by people with the knowledge and experience necessary to make informed decision-making decisions.

Fluid democracy leads to better decision-making. Liquid Democracy can lead to better decisions by evolving into a network of experts and making informed, domain specific decisions. Liquid democracy ultimately evolves into an elite system and the most skilled, knowledgeable and experienced voters make decisions in their field of expertise. Liquid democracy is scalable. In today's era, people are busy updating issues related to state governance. The decisions that need to be done are constantly increasing, and time is a valuable benefit, and many people do not simply want to spend on government decisions. Also, we are a professional society, and few people understand the situation in various fields. Therefore, through authorization, decision-making power is left to the hands of knowledgeable experts who are willing to invest time and knowledge to improve the overall governance of the country.