I really should point out the answer to Daniel Lawe - he pointed out something I often commit other than mistakes, allegories and texts. The fable is a complete (complete) symbolic or figurative story, not a literal fact. I think that I have argued with language students for a long time.
In other words, the Bible is completely literal, the creation of fundamentalism in the second half of the 19th century. This was what was not taught by anyone before that era, and the general literal meaning was still limited to the fundamentalistic belief system. All other belief systems indicate that it is both a sentence and an implication. A story like Eden and Jesus' life is worthwhile in both aspects. For example, if you are discussing the theme of Eden and sin, it is not just Adam and Eve sin.
So, when you say "Noah and his ark are stupid" you just respect the text. If you grew up in a fundamentalist environment, you are thinking about the way that you are taught to think about these things. However, as a human being, we communicate through stories, examples, and fables. So - probably the biblical claim - the story is both, there is a "moral of the story". And as these historical personality is related to us, we think about the morality of the story.
Therefore, Moses exists for God's will, not for a single purpose but for these two purposes. I have actually gained a degree in this field and I have learned a lot about the historical significance of prominent spiritual figures and events (do not forget that there are more things than the Bible ). There is no Moses because it presents a fable to Moses and requires a wide range of historical stories - this is called academic research - so it is possible to guarantee that God has Moses. Or, indeed, Moses is a car, as the Bible tells us that there is a man named Moses and that fables require cars. Therefore he was "summoned" to achieve God's purpose.
Please forgive modern terms, but these things have stories. It is a sign of psychological, spiritual and social evolution that you can maintain both expression of words and metaphor in your brain. So, Moses, John the Baptist, may not be Jesus (depending on whether you are a Muslim) is actually the United States. Just like us, we change and evolve to notice new things
Jesus = Please open your heart. Fundamentalists will get angry about this. Those who are tolerant of non-literal interpretation, and understanding of chakra can accept such ideas. On a human scale this is called evolution.
The allegorical interpretation of the Bible is an interpretive approach (interpretation) assuming that it tends to focus on spiritual consciousness, including allegorical meaning, moral (or sociological) and logical meaning, not literally. Meaning It is sometimes called quadriga and is a reference to a Roman tank drawn by four horses. Explanation by text: Explain the meaning of the event from a neutral point of view, understand the sentence in text, explain the time to write the sentence, and the location and language in which it is composed. In other words, since the 19th century it was generally decided to use more sophisticated methods of criticism such as source criticism and formal criticism.
Interpretation of literalism and interpretation of facts is a modern biblical method. Literary writers of the first century showed an amazing complexity in their allegorical method. The first Christian theologians searched the text for deeper spiritual information contained in the text. For example, the author of the Gospel and the letter is good at finding the prototype of Christ in the Hebrew Bible which does not exist. For centuries, Jewish rabbits have spread their ancient scriptures with mid-rush - the story fills the original standard story. In Midrush, like the wife of Lot, their actions were given names and explanations. The purpose of Midrash is to determine the more comprehensive meaning of paragraphs. The Jews did not encounter moral issues even if they extended the sacred stories. By telling the story of Christmas from the perspective of the nephew and the owner's boy, I did the same thing as the children's story.