Divine Foreknowledge

In the church of Christianity, it is always said that God knows everything. God begins and ends, and knows everything in between. People usually accept this before people start asking questions. The purpose of my writing is not to change someone's faith in God or to change their faith in God, but to challenge people, to think out of quotations, quotes, and boxes. Please consider God's understanding of all the advantages and disadvantages and be open to other solutions.

The foresight of God is the knowledge of the world and everything in it, the characteristics of God, in this case God (Schlosser) is predetermined. This God's foresight concept is assuming that the past and the future have not yet occurred and are seen and prescribed by God. The concept of God's foresight may be related to transcendental truth (Leibniz 31). If there is not any possible fact, there is no room for truth in the ability to know and see everything before the event. In other words, God creates everything, and has the power to see the past, the present and the future as well. Truth / knowledge can not be done without the factual background, so it is a priori. The foresight of God also follows the principle of contradiction. It includes "all the impossibility of concerns and things concerning possibilities or essential facts or their inevitability" (Leibniz 19)

In this article we discuss Leibniz's position that the sacred prediction of all events is consistent with human freedom and the reasons for agreeing to his position. To that end, I will first explain the position of Leibniz. Next, in order to make Leibniz 's position easier to understand, what is sacred forecast and what is human freedom is discussed. Based on these statements, I will provide Leibniz 's conclusion and then show that his position is indeed correct as there is no contradiction between the two concepts. It does not make divine prediction compatible with human freedom.

I fully agree with Leibniz's position on human freedom and divine foresight. The concept of God 's foresight about being free of obstructions to Leibnitz' s freedom of life seems reasonable in his interpretation. If sacred prejudice directly affects human decision making in real time, there will be more problems freely. This means that when making a decision, the sacred existence is to bring our choice to the right decision (ie the puppeteer). If this is the case there is no free will, as Leibniz pointed out in his interpretation of free will, our will is dominated by some external power (Schlösser) . Therefore, the action taken is not a free choice but is controlled. There is another way to see this scenario. This will better summarize Leibniz's claims (except Caesar's example). Let's say you have an ordinary person who can see the future in order to get away from the moment of divinity.