Diversity in Western vs Eastern Transformational Leadership

In 1985, the B, M and B busions studied the leadership of the Western world, which focused on the leaders of the West, and the influence they had on their subordinates. He discovered that leaders of various organizations have similar characteristics. He called this style "leadership in change." Through this style, the leader encourages the followers to transcend their own interests, serve the organization's interests, and have a special influence on the followers "(Robbins & Judges, 2012: 188). Bath discovered that using this leadership style culture places emphasis on the development of individual business performance within the organization.

In this article, we look at the four main processes of Western leadership research from the viewpoint of organization theory and judge whether leadership is true, whether reality is affected by race, culture, nationality and leadership. Or, if leadership may influence the efforts to achieve the world society. It is the time of the new generation of leadership, which plays a role in work, life, and leadership, and of course must manage disputes. Speaking of some problems in self-development. Taylor (2000) argues that looking back on our abilities is a valuable part of human life. We insist that introspection and introspective practice can promote professional development, link theory and practice, promote critical thinking, promote self-awareness and understanding, and empower practitioners

There is a controversy as to whether the empowerment of employees is the "Western" management principle, and this principle may not be translated into an "Oriental" culture like China. We compared the impact of authoritative leadership on the performance of employees' duties in Western and Eastern cultures. To my surprise, it turned out that leaders who are thought to have been given power by employees of eastern culture (such as China) have a greater impact on daily performance than Western culture (such as the United States). In other words, strengthening the behavior of leadership (for example, expanding authority and providing additional responsibility) is related to the execution of better day-to-day operations for eastern employees than Western culture. Such social norms should increase employee's acceptance of empowerment of leadership and further expand its influence.

The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast Hofstead 's five - dimensional culture as a comparative factor between the Western teaching method represented by the United States and the East side teaching method typified by Japan. In this article, I will first describe culture and its aspects, then compare the United States and Japan in each section and explain each aspect in detail. Later, each country will be offered the proposed leadership style based on Passegor theory and a reward system within the framework of five cultural aspects. In addition, I will also discuss and summarize the leadership problem that transcends the cultural boundaries of change leaders at the end. However, it is worth noting that the cultural aspect of Hofstede is only a general point of view of national culture.