Discussion on the Importance of Presidential Debate

INTRODUCTION Since the first TV debate by Richard Nixon Vice President (California State) and Senator John F. Kennedy (D - Massachusetts State) the election process has never been so. Despite the seemingly important aspects of democracy in the presidential debate, the actual impact of the discussion on the voter's perception of potential candidates has been highly questioned by many scholars. However, potential candidates, journalists, and some scholars expressed the importance of presidential debate in directing the attitude of the voters (White, 1982; Asher, 1988; Reagan, 1990) .

Let me give an example how the media thinks it very important to trick people and see the news: President's debate. Our mistaken impression is that the president's debate is very important and important, and that we have to adjust, but the reality is that the debate has not changed the minds of the voters. The vast majority of voters already have arguments and are only watching their cultural avatars accuse each other's cultural avatar and have their own ideas. The discussion mainly concerns tribal glasses, but we are convinced that, looking at the discussion, they are considered to be very important. The idea of ​​discussing such an important discussion is only a story of media evaluation. The presidential debate on the first television broadcast was in 1960. How did the president elect the president before the television presidential debate? A horrible event!

September US presidential candidates John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon participated in the first presidential debate on television. Discussions were held in Chicago, and the two discussed the domestic issues. In this historical discussion, Kennedy seems to dominate over opponents. Because he seems to be a clear nerve of Nixon. In addition, three discussions were held, and Nixon was able to regain calm. Kennedy will keep winning the election in November, Nixon eventually overcomes the presidential election in 1968

Story 1: Presidential debate, what they are not discussing: a new world order. Tonight, during the presidential debate, there is no mention of the biggest problem we face as the presidential election. The question is whether we will give up America's dear and inspired constitution, global list, and their world governments of world order. I support the Constitution. I need your prayers and I will help the CO. Story 2: H - 1 B workers are superseding Americans. As President of Copy, I will fight this abuse. First of all, you should adopt and hire Americans. First we must give tax credits to Americans, give scholarships, subsidies to small and medium enterprises, and government contracts as well. The second is to "make the United States a top priority and place it in the groove and become part of the new world order, which will allow them to introduce a new world order with her ugly world government."