Discussion of Bradley's The Principles of Logic

Discussion about the logical principle of Bradley "Wolves are mammals", I did not insist on my opinion about wolves, but about the generality of this real beast. To Bradley, admitting this is a general term that recognizes that thinking is a reference to independent reality. But if you face one of these real cuspid teeth, please note that I will continue saying "This is a wolf." Each term in this single judgment is itself general. Specificity and rich detail.

Question: Dr. Craig, Dr. Bradley pointed out that you can easily touch during the discussion. Do you believe that it is logically impossible for God to create a world with our free will, you say: "So, what is heaven is?" I'd like to comment. Dr. Craig: I understand. When we talk about the possible world, we do not talk about planets and the universe, so it is difficult to convey these difficult concepts to the audience. We are talking about the biggest thing. And I agree that anyone in the world can freely choose to accept God's redemption. It is logically possible. What I am talking about is that it may not be realistic for God to try to realize such a world.

Therefore, based on the logical principle, I propose to discuss topics of error. ... The universality of a logical writer is usually against the plan. Whenever they have to deal with something beyond logical elements, they completely abandon the principles they occupy in creation and interpretation, to a loose, ambiguous and popular language It will change ... professional logic thesis is not oddly adjusted. (1875, III, Introduction)

Logic is defined as a study of correct thought rules. (Www.philosophyclass.com/logic) It focuses on the principles leading to reasonable thinking and discussion. The basic concept of logic is argumentation. Discussions must be distinguished from "discussion". It is a dispute or disagreement among different people. The logical concept of the argument is "a series of statements, one of which is a conclusion and the other a premise, and that premise supports that conclusion." (Www.philosophyclass.com/logic) In other words, there is evidence that supports it