Today, most people think something is going on about the importance of religious beliefs in daily life, but no one can be convinced if it can generalize it or even promote it . As industrialization and modernization progressed, religion lost social significance. This is particularly troubling for sociologists. Simply put, as secularized "classical theorists" said a century ago, when society became modern it became secular. Whether modernity inevitably means secularity.
In order for secularity 3 to be considered, it is necessary to question some of the premises of ordinary discussions of secularities 1 and 2. Taylor used most of his books for the history of conditions that caused secularism 3, and they could not be generalized with normal expressions. Taylor believes that reform - the full rejection of religious life and the necessity of monk 's doctrine for everyone - is only the first climax of the Christian millennium pressure on reform. Then, even if Protestantism itself has problems, we have revealed that long - term pressures on reform are continuing. Emphasize progress in humanism
The second part of the book discusses the recent powerful pedigree analysis attempting to explain the process of secularization and the increasing secular modernity. Many contributors are interested in explaining Marcel Gauchet and Charles Taylor, or comparing both. AndréCloots carefully studied that Gauchet 's understanding of secularization is a relationship between' disillusionment 'and modernity. According to Gauchet and Gianni Vattimo, Andreas Michel studied the important role of Avatar in the process of secularization and compared their different views on this issue. The explanation of secularization by Taylor is the subject of contribution by Charles Lockwood and Gerber Fury. They address allegations of Taylor 's secular ages and the conceptualization of Taylor' s external and purely functional resistance (such as that provided by Gauchet).