Discussing the Obligation to Help the Absolutely Poor

Discussing the obligation to support the absolute poor about who gets what and who should bear it is a question of philosophical problems people try to answer indefinitely, It does not lead to possible conclusions. No matter what consequences are determined, unhappiness seems to be a nearly decisive condition for humans, so some people are destined to feel uncomfortable about it, and some people are always on something I am dissatisfied. However, some people try to answer this question in a reasonable and ethical way, such as Nozick, Singer, Rachels.

Discussion on absolute poverty, absolute wealth, moral equivalent of murder, duty of aid, and disagreement over his argument. Singer defines absolute poverty as a means to mean that people are below the current poverty situation, in short, it is poorer than the average poor in most third world countries. Peter noted that some problems in absolutely poor countries are due to eight times the infant mortality rate, one third of the life expectancy, a 60% reduction in adult literacy rate, malnutrition, and development of protein development in infantile brain development It was pointed out that it was a lack. Singer then defines "absolute wealth" as "people who have more income and too much food than they need to provide all the basic necessities of life" (Singer 141: 1993).

I have adopted an economic approach to believing in absolute wealth but I am obligated to adopt political methods and oppose our own methods to cast doubts on the singer's argument. While their obligations to help absolute wealth and less fortunate people are all good, considering wealth is a lot of other things to worry about just like all the internal problems of the country they belong to There may be. Problems of the outside world How can we stop taking care of the poor when American people are losing their jobs and homes nationwide, when they are on the brink of poverty? This effectively integrates objections into our own. In other words, we take care of people we need in moral obligations in a timely manner.