Discourse and Reality

Every language, communication, or discourse theory has a fundamental premise about how it relates to the world. Philosophically, it requires a specific epistemological position. It is difficult to imagine how human language theory can not access the world, so I know how that knowledge relates to language-related assumptions. Therefore, I start a book with epistemological language communication. Specifically mentioned in this chapter is that, briefly, language communication and discourse can not be separated from the world or reality, but can be thought of as constituting it completely. I call this view a reality - I will compose my view

Michel Foucault is a post-structuralist who believes that the existence of humans depends on the form of knowledge - discourse - like language. Language / discourse defines the reality for us. In order to think, we have an obligation to use these definitions. The knowledge that we have about the world is offered to us through the language and language we meet in the age and place of our lives. So we know who we are, what we think is real, what we think is discourse

Foucault is primarily interested in conversational phenomena through his way of defining the reality of the world of society, the thoughts of people living there, and his career about things. For Foucault, discourse is an institutional way to tell or write reality, which defines what you can understand and think about the world and what you can not believe. For example, in the "sexual history" of books, Foucault believes that the new "sexual" discourse fundamentally changes the way we think about desire, happiness, and inner self. In Foucault's claims, sexual discourse creates it through the practice of certain powers / knowledge, not seeing some essential truth about the existence of human identity (see next article).

First-class theorists are involved in the early discourse of strange theories such as Michelle Foucault, Judith Butler, Eve Kosovsky Sedgwick. This discourse focuses on how to build knowledge using language. Michel Foucault criticized the concept of 'suppressional assumption' from the 17th century to the middle of the 20th century in the history of sex history and wrote it. Marriage between wives is restricted, and gender is prohibited. Because of this oppression, people try to establish their own sexual discourses to release sexual emotions and remove sexual restraints. Foucault believes that "repressive assumption" is a limited attempt to combine sexual open discourse with personal release. In fact, during this time discussion on gender has flourished. Foucault insists on that