Discipline vs Democracy: Party Discipline in Canadian Politics

Canada has always been regarded as a democratic and fair country. Most people dominate and everyone is speaking. This is obvious in some areas of Canada in the political context of the House, but it is not so. Members of Congress are not as strong as they say, and because of party discipline they actually have very limited power. Party discipline greeted parliamentarians and trained to follow the party leader and its whip as sealed.

Party unity and unity were always an integral part of the Westminster parliament system. Leaders of the Canadian House of Representatives strongly celebrated the party as a single organization voting for this issue, especially at the General Assembly with the help of "whip" (Olson, 2003). Party discipline to some extent is essential for parties to maintain their forces, as political parties need trust for the majority of the legislature of the government, but this does not actually reflect democracy indeed.

Political parties are essential to the health of Canada's democracy as it organizes political competition and helps to build the functions of our political system. However, as an organization there are signs that the political parties in Canada are weakening. The political party's membership base is aging and declining, and a small number of Canadians view themselves as partisan supporters. The voter turnout rate in Canada has declined over the past two decades and questions are raised about the ability of political parties to contact voters. Political parties in Canada are equally important in the management of our political system, but the relationship with voters is becoming increasingly vulnerable

A global review and America's experience in the political arena seems to be rather symbolic rather than exceptional. As a result of the country one after another the discipline of the party is dissolved, which mainly contributes to the politics of free institutions centered on personal or instantaneous problems, there is no ongoing system. In the context of the United States, Professor Richard Pelders mentioned this central characteristic of modern politics as a process of political division. "External proliferation of political power is far from the whole party.Civil servants.16