Disarment, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Outer Space: Mongolia´s Stand

This is extremely important for disarmament and development. Paragraph 18 explained that non-military threats are one of the major concerns of global concern. Environmental deterioration poses a threat to sustainable development. Due to wealth and poverty inequality, the world can not be a safe place. Chapter 3 of the final document is military expenses and military expenses. Military production or employment will lead to a decrease in employment due to the funds used for military-related production rather than private projects.

The Space Convention (OST), the most widely accepted international space law document, establishes a simple and comprehensive system that limits the use of weapons of mass destruction in outer space or outer space. Apart from the fact that nuclear weapons are specifically mentioned, this term should be executed in the broadest sense, as the Space Act does not define weapons of mass destruction for that purpose. Given that chemical weapons and biological weapons are prohibited as a matter of the International Humanitarian Act (IHL) and temporary use of radiation weapons is still hypothetical, the content of the norms is mainly related to the use of nuclear weapons To do. Weapons, currently there is no such ban

The general concept of the "peaceful use" of the universe and the more specific utilization system of weapons of mass destruction has been explored before, and the third aspect of the space law becomes "militarization" or "weaponization" It is relevant. International Space of Responsibility established by the Space Treaty (OST) and the 1972 Liability Treaty The review of the liability system is particularly important if the acceptance of space law does not generally prohibit the militarization of the universe . Although militarization in the broadest sense is legal, the concept of responsibility limits at least "the weaponization of the universe" (meaning the use of the universe to develop direct force in armed violence)

The term "weapons of mass destruction" continues to be considered for normal use, usually within the scope of nuclear weapons control; Ronald Reagan mentioned the 1967 used at the Reykjavik Summit in 1986. Space Treaty "George HW Bush, the successor to Reagan, mainly referred to chemical weapons in a speech to the United Nations in 1989. The end of the Cold War hinders US dependence on nuclear weapons and shifts its focus to disarmament. With the invasion of Kuwait in 1990 and the Gulf War in 1991, Iraq's nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs became the first concern of the first Bush administration. Following the war, Western politicians and media, including Bill Clinton, continued to use this term. Usually it refers to an ongoing attempt to disassemble Iraq's weapon program.