dilemma

The logic main assumption consists of two or more hypotheses, if the secondary premise is "A, it is B, if it is C it is a disjunction of A or C". B or D ".

The word "dilemma" is a combination of lemma meaning "proposition, subject, or subject" and the prefix di- meaning "2". Our world is full of propositions, themes, and themes - that we have to make decisions in life. If you have to choose between two action plans or you have to choose to do something without doing it, either choice is subjectively dilemma unless it is appropriate. Prisoned by Scylla and Charybdis, it was truly confined between the rock and the hard place in the dilemma. As you have seen, the dilemma of dealing with only two offensive options is powerful enough to produce many descriptive languages ​​for many years. But in today's complex environment people say that they are in a dilemma, you can not be sure that their problems are limited to two alternatives. They may face more complicated situations. Although the initial meaning is still most common, extending this dilemma to include this more general "difficult or confusing situation or problem" is an example of normal language growth. The initial meaning of the dilemma containing two alternatives still exists, and that is a good thing. However, this broader meaning is not only universal but also acceptable, which can be found in various educated books.

Moral dilemmas and humanitarian ethical dilemmas and humanitarian ethical dilemmas and humanitarian ethical dilemmas and humanitarian ethical dilemmas and humanitarian relief issues There are three types of moral dilemmas. The first includes selection between options with conflicting advantages and cost. This dilemma can be solved through professional training. The second form focuses on moral subjectivity and reflects the dilemma of how to cope when the expected beneficiary's values ​​conflict with values ​​of humanitarian agencies. Such conflicts can be solved through participation and empowerment mechanisms.

In the literature on moral dilemmas, distinctions are often made with various types of dilemmas. Only a fraction of these differences are listed here. It is noteworthy that supporters and opponents of the dilemma tend to draw out some, if not all, of these differences. In most cases, the motive to do so is clear. Supporters of the dilemma can distinguish between dilemmas of type \ (V \) and \ (W \). The result is usually a message to the opponent of the dilemma: "You think you can solve all moral contradictions, which you can understand because the contradiction of \ (V \) type is resolvable, but \ (W \) type conflicts can not be resolved, so there are a few real moral dilemmas, contrary to yours. "Likewise, the opponents against the dilemma are \ (X \) and \ (X \ Y \) dilemma can be distinguished.

There are various kinds of social dilemmas, there is a way to show them to people. For example, some dilemmas are that joint action involves restricting access to shared resources, a dilemma involves a dilemma that joint actions contribute to shared resources or goods. This situation can also be expressed by a predicament "staying to a certain extent" and a predicament "maintaining to a certain extent". In addition, the results of others and self can be presented in different ways, and people can explain the same social dilemma in different ways. For example, do business or interpersonal relationships. In many cases, the way people present social dilemmas is very different in the way they do what others expect from others.