Dilemma

"Between the rock and the hard place" redirects here. For other uses, please refer to Rock and Hard Ground (ambiguity avoidance).

The dilemma (Greek: "dual proposition") is a problem that provides two unrelated possibilities, neither explicitly acceptable nor desirable. The recognition of time and time strongly influences decision making. This dilemma is sometimes used as a rhetorical device in the form of "you must accept A or B"; where A and B will be the respective propositions leading to further conclusions. The application is incorrect, it constitutes the wrong dichotomy, error

Moral dilemmas and humanitarian ethical dilemmas and humanitarian ethical dilemmas and humanitarian ethical dilemmas and humanitarian ethical dilemmas and humanitarian relief issues There are three types of moral dilemmas. The first includes selection between options with conflicting advantages and cost. This dilemma can be solved through professional training. The second form focuses on moral subjectivity and reflects the dilemma of how to cope when the expected beneficiary's values ​​conflict with values ​​of humanitarian agencies. Such conflicts can be solved through participation and empowerment mechanisms.

In the literature on moral dilemmas, distinctions are often made with various types of dilemmas. Only a fraction of these differences are listed here. It is noteworthy that supporters and opponents of the dilemma tend to draw out some, if not all, of these differences. In most cases, the motive to do so is clear. Supporters of the dilemma can distinguish between dilemmas of type \ (V \) and \ (W \). The result is usually a message to the opponent of the dilemma: "You think you can solve all moral contradictions, which you can understand because the contradiction of \ (V \) type is resolvable, but \ (W \) type conflicts can not be resolved, so there are a few real moral dilemmas, contrary to yours. "Likewise, the opponents against the dilemma are \ (X \) and \ (X \ Y \) dilemma can be distinguished.

There are various kinds of social dilemmas, there is a way to show them to people. For example, some dilemmas are that joint action involves restricting access to shared resources, a dilemma involves a dilemma that joint actions contribute to shared resources or goods. This situation can also be expressed by a predicament "staying to a certain extent" and a predicament "maintaining to a certain extent". In addition, the results of others and self can be presented in different ways, and people can explain the same social dilemma in different ways. For example, do business or interpersonal relationships. In many cases, the way people present social dilemmas is very different in the way they do what others expect from others.