Differing Views on Humans as Portrayed by William Golding in Lord of the Flies and Jean Jacques Rousseau

In the book "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding, Golding has the philosophy he applied throughout the book. The main idea of ​​Golding's philosophy is that people are naturally cruel. Shortly thereafter, there was another philosopher named Jean Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau's philosophy is opposed to the philosophy of Golding, and they believe that humans in normal condition are generally good. I think some of Golding's philosophy is correct and I think some are wrong.

William Golding, the founder of the Lord 's flies, explains evil as our innate character and learns to control it. That is a good thing, but the world around us and society change us into evil, but what is regarded as evil? Those who decide what is evil and what is not solely a man or a woman, it is identified as a community, this explanation of evil seems to be consistent with Rousseau 's belief.

William Golding 's novel "Lord F" challenges Jean - Jacques Rousseau' s Origins and Fundamentals of Human Inequality Originals Human Perspective Novels begin with an airplane crash. His role, innocent boys, were trapped in a remote desert island. Crash is a smart way to return a boy to the natural state described by Rousseau. Rousseau thinks that people are pure, but eventually it is corroded by society. On the other hand, Golding believes that people were born of evil. Therefore, people are a corrupt society. Golding used his role to prove his claim. When the rules of adults and civil society no longer take responsibility for their actions, the boys left behind to form their society are immediately involved in confusion and violence.

Is it naturally worse than William Golding thinks? Or, as Jean Jacques Rousseau said, people are kind, but are inevitably corrupted by the community in which he lives? Both philosophers have strong opinions and reasons about their beliefs. The point of view of Golding is well shown in his novel "Flies of the Lord". This is a little boy with a strong heart trapped in a small island that I have to find his way to survive. After reading this novel, I agreed to Rousseau's view of humanity.