Differences Between the Aristotelian Four Fold Theory and The Basic Theory of Modern Causation

Aristotle is known as the father of Western causality theory. "I know what it is, to know the reasons," he is well-known. He proposed a way to interpret causality. It is called 4-way reason theory. The theory includes formal reasons, material causes, effective causes and causes of termination. There are many philosophers who agree with Aristotle's modern causality, but one philosopher thinks that the theory of four times the theory is not necessary in particular.

There are two major types of causality theory: Hume's theory (as "ordinary wording") and causal realism (as a causal mechanism). According to Hume's theory, causality is completely constituted from empirical facts between observable variables; there is no need for a potential causal relationship, causality or causality. Causal relations scholars view the concept of causality and the power of causality as fundamental, and claim that the work of scientific research is to obtain empirically correct theories and assumptions about their causal mechanisms. Let's consider various arguments about this sentence. X causes Y.

Many ideas have been advocated in the 40 years history of development theory. Theory of growth and modernization, basic demand theory, appropriate technical theory, radical and revolutionary theory: Various works seem to boil into four main methods. Each of these methods has several variants. Therefore we summarize only the main function and the most important sub theory. It was developed with wealth. Modernization groups are seeking cultural or psychological reasons for the continuing poverty of the Third World. Is farmers economically unreasonable? Are there non-Westerners lacking individualism and achievement orientation that contribute to modern capitalism? Is the culture of the third world sufficient to create a modern economy rationally and scientifically?